Reynolds v. Harris
Filing
3
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Craig M. Kellison on 9/20/11 ORDERING that Plaintiff's MOTION for leave to proceed in forma pauperis 2 is GRANTED. (Mena-Sanchez, L)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
JOHN REYNOLDS,
12
13
14
No. CIV S-11-2387-MCE-CMK
Plaintiff,
vs.
ORDER
KAMALA D. HARRIS,
15
Defendant.
16
/
17
Plaintiff, who is proceeding pro se, brings this civil action challenging the
18
constitutionality of California Fish and Game Code §§ 5653-5653.9 and seeking prospective
19
declaratory and injunctive relief.1 Pending before the court is plaintiff’s request for leave to
20
proceed in forma pauperis (Doc. 2). Plaintiff’s complaint, and service thereof by the United
21
States Marshal if appropriate, will be addressed separately. The Clerk of the Court shall not
22
issue summons or set this matter for an initial scheduling conference unless specifically directed
23
by the court to do so.
24
25
26
1
The court takes judicial notice of an identical action filed in this court as Reynolds
v. State of California, E. Dist. Cal. case no. CIV-S-11-1381-MCE-CMK. See Chandler v. U.S.,
378 F.2d 906, 909 (9th Cir. 1967) (stating that court may take judicial notice of its own records).
1
1
2
3
4
Plaintiff has submitted the affidavit required by 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a) showing that
plaintiff is unable to prepay fees and costs or give security therefor.
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff’s motion for leave to
proceed in forma pauperis (Doc. 2) is granted.
5
6
7
8
DATED: September 20, 2011
______________________________________
CRAIG M. KELLISON
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?