Arceo v. DVI, et al

Filing 113

ORDER signed by Senior Judge Morrison C. England, Jr. on 8/17/2020 ADOPTING 106 Findings and Recommendations in full and DISMISSING this action without prejudice. CASE CLOSED. (Huang, H)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

ANTHONY ARCEO,

12
13
14
15

No. 2: 11-cv-02396 MCE KJN P

Plaintiff,
v.

ORDER

SOCORRO SALINAS, et al.,
Defendants.

16
17

Plaintiff, proceeding pro se, filed this civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C.

18

§ 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C.

19

§ 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.

20

On May 18, 2020, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which

21

were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to the

22

findings and recommendations were to be filed within thirty days. On June 26, 2020, plaintiff

23

was granted an additional thirty days in which to file his pretrial statement and objections to the

24

findings and recommendations. Plaintiff was cautioned that failure to comply with the order

25

would result in the findings and recommendations being routed to the district court for review and

26

adoption. (ECF No. 110 at 2.)

27
28

Thirty days have now passed, and neither party has filed objections to the findings and
recommendations, and plaintiff has not otherwise responded.
1

1

The Court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be

2

supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY

3

ORDERED that:

4
5

1. The findings and recommendations filed May 18, 2020 (ECF No. 106), are ADOPTED
in full; and

6
7
8
9

2. This action is DISMISSED without prejudice. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(f); Local Rule
110.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: August 17, 2020

10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2