Arceo v. DVI, et al

Filing 141

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 4/13/2022 ORDERING counsel for defendant to respond to plaintiff's 140 motion within 21 days from the date of this order. (Yin, K)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

ANTHONY ARCEO,

12

Plaintiff,

13
14

No. 2:11-cv-2396 MCE KJN P

v.

ORDER

SOCORRO SALINAS,

15

Defendant.

16
17

Plaintiff is a civil detainee, proceeding pro se. On August 3, 2021, the parties settled this

18

action on the record, and it was agreed that the county would make the check payable to plaintiff

19

and then he could sign it over to his mother. Subsequently, plaintiff filed a motion claiming that

20

trust account officers have wrongfully placed a hold on the settlement proceeds.

21

Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that counsel for defendant shall

22

respond to plaintiff’s motion (ECF No. 140) within twenty-one days from the date of this order.

23

Dated: April 13, 2022

24
25
26

/arce2396.fb

27
28
1