Arceo v. DVI, et al

Filing 62

ORDER signed by District Judge Morrison C. England, Jr on 7/24/2017 ADOPTING in FULL 61 Findings and Recommendations; DENYING 52 Motion to Amend the Complaint. (Washington, S)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

ANTHONY ARCEO,

12

Plaintiff,

13
14

No. 2:11-cv-2396 MCE KJN P

v.

ORDER

SOCORRO SALINAS, et al.,

15

Defendants.

16
Plaintiff, committed to a state hospital and proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights

17
18

action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States

19

Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.
On June 22, 2017, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which

20
21

were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to the

22

findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Neither party has filed

23

objections to the findings and recommendations.
The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be

24
25

supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY

26

ORDERED that:

27

///

28

///
1

1

1. The findings and recommendations filed June 22, 2017, are adopted in full; and

2

2. Plaintiff’s motion to amend (ECF No. 52) is denied.

3

IT IS SO ORDERED.

4
5

Dated: July 24, 2017

6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2