Arceo v. DVI, et al

Filing 89

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 09/20/19 ORDERING that within thirty days from the date of this order, the parties shall file the attached notice, informing the court whether a settlement conference is appropriate, whether they waive disqualification for the undersigned to hold the settlement conference, or whether they choose to have the settlement conference held by a different judge. (Plummer, M)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

ANTHONY ARCEO,

12
13
14

No. 2:11-cv-2396 MCE KJN P

Plaintiff,
v.

ORDER

SOCORRO SALINAS, ET AL.,

15

Defendants.

16
17

Plaintiff is a state prisoner, proceeding without counsel. This case proceeds on plaintiff’s

18

claim alleging defendant Savage retaliated against plaintiff in September of 2012. On September

19

11, 2019, the district court remanded this matter back to the undersigned for further scheduling.

20

(ECF No. 88.)

21

Good cause appearing, the parties shall inform the court whether a settlement conference

22

is appropriate. If so, by filing the attached notice within thirty days, the parties shall notify the

23

court whether they waive disqualification for the undersigned to hold the settlement conference or

24

whether they request a different judge. Plaintiff shall also indicate his preference to appear in

25

person or by videoconference, if available. Failure to waive disqualification will result in the case

26

being set for settlement conference before a different magistrate judge.

27

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that within thirty days from the date of this order, the parties

28

shall file the attached notice, informing the court whether a settlement conference is appropriate,
1

1

whether they waive disqualification for the undersigned to hold the settlement conference, or

2

whether they choose to have the settlement conference held by a different judge.

3

Dated: September 20, 2019

4
5
/arce2396.set

6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2

1
2
3

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

4

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

5
6

ANTHONY ARCEO,

7
8
9

No. 2:11-cv-2396 MCE KJN P

Plaintiff,
v.

NOTICE OF ELECTION RE SETTLEMENT
CONFERENCE

SOCORRO SALINAS, ET AL.,

10

Defendants.

11
12

1. As required by court order, the parties notify the court of the following election:

13

____ The party signing below requests a settlement conference.

14

____ Pursuant to Local Rule 270(b) of the Eastern District of California, the party signing

15

below affirmatively requests that the assigned Magistrate Judge participate in the settlement

16

conference and, further, waives any claim of disqualification of the assigned Magistrate Judge on

17

that basis thereafter. This waiver is not to be construed as consent to the Magistrate Judge’s

18

jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 636(c)(1).

19
20
21
22

OR
____ The party signing below requests that a different judge hold the settlement
conference.
AND
2. Plaintiff indicates his preference by checking one:

23
_____ Plaintiff would like to participate in the settlement conference in person.
24
OR
25
_____ Plaintiff would like to participate in the settlement conference by video conference.
26
27

DATED:
________________________________
Plaintiff or Counsel for Defendants

28
1