Colon v. Miranda et al
Filing
38
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 8/22/2012 ORDERING the 35 Objections to Findings and Recommendations is STRICKEN from the record. (Donati, J)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9
FELIX COLON,
10
11
12
Plaintiff,
No. 2:11-cv-2407 MCE GGH P
vs.
R. MIRANDA, et al.,
13
ORDER
Defendants.
14
/
15
Plaintiff is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis with an action brought
16
pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 1983. Several defendants filed a motion to dismiss on March 8, 2012.1 On
17
April 2, 2012, plaintiff requested a 30 day extension to file an opposition which was granted,
18
however that time passed and plaintiff did not file an opposition or otherwise communicate with
19
the court. On June 6, 2012, the undersigned ordered that plaintiff file an opposition to the
20
motions to dismiss within 14 days or else it would be recommended that this action be dismissed.
21
Plaintiff did not file an opposition or otherwise communicate with the court so the undersigned
22
recommended on July 10, 2012, that this action be dismissed. Objections were to be filed within
23
fourteen days, however nothing was filed until August 10, 2012. On August 10, 2012, another
24
prisoner filed objections and an opposition to the original motion to dismiss on behalf of
25
plaintiff. The other prisoner states he has been helping plaintiff in litigating the current action,
26
1
Another defendant was served on April 17, 2012, and also moved to dismiss this action
on April 24, 2012, on the same grounds as the earlier filed motion.
1
but because they were transferred and placed in separate buildings it has been difficult. The other
2
prisoner states he has been unable to have plaintiff review, sign and serve an opposition,
3
therefore the prisoner has submitted the filing on behalf of plaintiff.
4
Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 11(a) states:
5
Signature. Every pleading, written motion, and other paper must be signed by at
least one attorney of record in the attorney's name--or by a party personally if the
party is unrepresented. The paper must state the signer's address, e-mail address,
and telephone number. Unless a rule or statute specifically states otherwise, a
pleading need not be verified or accompanied by an affidavit. The court must
strike an unsigned paper unless the omission is promptly corrected after being
called to the attorney's or party's attention
6
7
8
9
While plaintiff is proceeding pro se and his filings must be liberally construed and
10
the undersigned is aware that jailhouse lawyers often aid prisoners, certain rules must be
11
followed or else the entire legal process becomes nonsensical. Plaintiff has not reviewed and
12
cannot attest to the accuracy of the statements, claims and arguments in this filing, nor can the
13
undersigned be certain that this other prisoner is truly representing plaintiff’s best interests. It is
14
not clear if plaintiff even wishes to continue with this litigation as he has not communicated with
15
the court since April 2, 2012, despite several requests from the court. Therefore, the filing shall
16
be stricken. See Valiant-Bey v. Morris, 620 F. Supp. 903, 904 (E.D. Mo. 1985).
17
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the August 10, 2012, filing (Doc.
18
35) is stricken from the record.
19
DATED: August 22, 2012
20
/s/ Gregory G. Hollows
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
21
22
GGH:AB
colo2407.str
23
24
25
26
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?