Colon v. Miranda et al

Filing 7

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 9/22/11 ORDERING that the Attorney General must respond to plaintiffs motion for preliminary injunctive relief, within 14 days; Clerk of the Court is directed to send a copy of the 1 complaint, a copy of plaintiffs 2 motion for preliminary injunction and a copy of this order upon Monica Anderson, Supervising Deputy Attorney General; Clerk of the Court is directed to send a copy of the 1 complaint, a copy of plaintiffs 2 motion for pr eliminary injunction and a copy of this order upon defendant Chief Medical Executive Dorothy Swingle, High Desert State Prison. Plaintiff shall submit, within 30 days from the date of this order, an affidavit in support of his request to proceed in forma pauperis on the form provided by the Clerk of Court, or the appropriate filing fee; plaintiffs failure to comply with this order will result in the dismissal of this action; and Clerk of the Court is directed to send plaintiff a new Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis By a Prisoner. (cc Monica Anderson)(Dillon, M)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 FELIX COLON, 11 Plaintiff, 12 13 No. CIV S-11-2407 GGH P vs. R. MIRANDA, et al., 14 Defendants. 15 ORDER / 16 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed a civil rights action pursuant 17 to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff has also filed a motion for a preliminary injunction. Plaintiff has 18 not, however, filed an in forma pauperis affidavit or paid the required filing fee. See 28 U.S.C. 19 §§ 1914(a), 1915(a). Plaintiff will be provided the opportunity either to submit the appropriate 20 affidavit in support of a request to proceed in forma pauperis or to submit the appropriate filing 21 fee. 22 In his complaint and preliminary injunction, plaintiff states that he was transferred 23 to High Desert State Prison on November 18, 2009. At that time plaintiff was being prescribed 24 Tramedol to treat a spinal injury. Plaintiff states that a few weeks later he was taken off 25 Tramedol and instead prescribed Tylenol. A little more than one year later, on January 11, 2011, 26 plaintiff requested to be again prescribed Tramedol but this request was denied by defendants. 1 1 Plaintiff states he is in a great deal of pain as a result. 2 Due to the concerns plaintiff raises, the court will direct a response from the 3 Attorney General in 14 days. The court is cognizant of the demands placed upon prison officials 4 and the Attorney General by having to respond to seriatim preliminary injunction motions, 5 however, the court will entertain the preliminary injunction motion in this case. 6 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 7 1. The Attorney General must respond to plaintiff’s motion for preliminary 8 injunctive relief, within fourteen days; 9 2. The Clerk of the Court is directed to send a copy of the complaint (Doc. 1), a 10 copy of plaintiff’s motion for preliminary injunction (Doc. 2) and a copy of this order upon 11 Monica Anderson, Supervising Deputy Attorney General;. 12 3. In addition, the Clerk of the Court is directed to send a copy of the complaint 13 (Doc. 1), a copy of plaintiff’s motion for preliminary injunction (Doc. 2) and a copy of this order 14 upon defendant Chief Medical Executive Dorothy Swingle, High Desert State Prison, 475-750 15 Rice Canyon Road, P.O. 750, Susanville, CA 96127. 16 4. Plaintiff shall submit, within thirty days from the date of this order, an affidavit 17 in support of his request to proceed in forma pauperis on the form provided by the Clerk of 18 Court, or the appropriate filing fee; plaintiff’s failure to comply with this order will result in the 19 dismissal of this action; and 20 5. The Clerk of the Court is directed to send plaintiff a new Application to 21 Proceed In Forma Pauperis By a Prisoner. 22 DATED: September 22, 2011 23 /s/ Gregory G. Hollows UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 24 25 GGH: AB colo2407.pi 26 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?