Johnson v. US Attorney General
Filing
4
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 11/9/2011 ORDERING that petitioner's 3 motion to proceed IFP is DENIED; petitioner has 30 days to submit the $5.00 filing fee. (Yin, K)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
VERNELL JOHNSON
11
Petitioner,
12
13
No. CIV S-11-2418 CKD P
vs.
U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL
14
Respondent.
15
ORDER
/
16
Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed a petition for a writ of
17
habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254, together with an application to proceed in forma
18
pauperis.
19
Examination of the in forma pauperis application reveals that petitioner is able to
20
afford the costs of suit. According to petitioner’s affidavit submitted in support of his
21
application, he had a balance of $636.60 as of August 26, 2011, eighteen days before he filed his
22
petition. The fee for filing a habeas action is only $5.00. Accordingly, the motion to proceed in
23
forma pauperis will be denied. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a).
24
\\\\
25
\\\\
26
\\\\
1
1
Petitioner will have thirty days from the entry of this order in which to submit the
2
filing fee of $5.00. Failure to submit the fee will result in dismissal of this action under
3
Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(b).1
4
In accordance with the above, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
5
1. Petitioner’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis (Docket No. 3) is denied;
6
2. Petitioner has thirty days from the entry of this order in which to submit the
7
$5.00 filing fee. Failure to submit the fee will result in dismissal of this action under Fed. R.
8
Civ. P. 41(b).
9
Dated: November 9, 2011
10
_____________________________________
CAROLYN K. DELANEY
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
11
12
13
14
15
16
3
john2418.ord
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
1
26
If petitioner’s financial status has changed such that he cannot afford the cost of filing this
action, he may file a new application to proceed in forma pauperis.
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?