Asberry v. Cate et al

Filing 124

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 10/21/13 denying 118 Motion for law library access. The discovery cut-off date of 1/03/14 is vacated and re-set to 02/20/14; the dispositive motion cut-off date of 03/28/14 is vacated and re-set for 4/25/14. (Plummer, M)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 TONY ASBERRY, 12 13 14 15 No. 2:11-cv-2462 KJM KJN P Plaintiff, v. ORDER MATTHEW CATE, et al., Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff is a state prisoner, proceeding without counsel, with a civil rights action pursuant 18 to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Pending before the court is plaintiff’s motion for law library access filed 19 September 23, 2013. (ECF No. 118.) For the following reasons, this motion is denied. 20 Plaintiff, who is housed at the R.J. Donovan Correctional Facility (“RJDCF”), alleges that 21 he is being denied law library access. Plaintiff observes that on September 13, 2013, the court 22 issued a scheduling order setting the discovery cut-off for January 3, 2014. Plaintiff observes that 23 the September 13, 2013 scheduling order also stated that all requests for discovery were to be 24 served not later than sixty days prior to that date. 25 Attached to plaintiff’s motion as exhibits are copies of forms filed by plaintiff requesting 26 law library access. In September 2013, plaintiff submitted a request for law library access. (ECF 27 No. 118 at 6.) On September 17, 2013, Law Librarian E. Simon apparently denied the request by 28 responding that “PLU [Preferred Legal User] status is granted only for 30 days immediately prior 1 1 to the court deadline.” (Id.) 2 On September 17, 2013, plaintiff submitted a form for PLU status. (Id. at 7.) In this 3 form, plaintiff stated that his court deadline was September 13, 2013, through January 3, 2014, 4 apparently referring to the dates set for conducting discovery discussed in the September 13, 2014 5 scheduling order. (Id.) Plaintiff also wrote in the request that he needed PLU status in order to 6 conduct discovery because his deadline was January 3, 2014. (Id.) In response, Law Librarian E. 7 Simon responded that plaintiff would be eligible for PLU status on December 3, 2013. (Id. at 7.) 8 The scheduling order stated that all discovery requests were to be served no later than 9 sixty days prior to January 3, 2014. Therefore, plaintiff had until November 3, 2013, to serve 10 defendants with discovery requests. Plaintiff’s request for PLU status did not clearly inform Law 11 Librarian E. Simon of the November 3, 2013 deadline. Had plaintiff stated that his deadline was 12 November 3, 2013, the court presumes that plaintiff would have been granted PLU status 30 days 13 prior to this deadline. 14 Because of the confusion regarding the discovery cut-off and plaintiff’s related law library 15 access, the discovery cut-off and dispositive motion filing dates will be re-set. The discovery cut- 16 off date is re-set to February 20, 2014. All requests for discovery shall be served not later than 60 17 days prior to that date, i.e., on or before December 23, 2013. If plaintiff requests PLU status to 18 prepare his discovery requests, he shall inform the Law Librarian that his deadline is December 19 23, 2013. According to the documents submitted by plaintiff in support of the pending motion, 20 plaintiff will be granted PLU status 30 days prior to a court ordered deadline. Therefore, 21 plaintiff’s request for PLU status in order to prepare his discovery requests should be made on or 22 before November 23, 2013. 23 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 24 1. Plaintiff’s motion for law library access (ECF No. 118) is denied; 25 //// 26 //// 27 //// 28 //// 2 1 2. The discovery cut-off date of January 3, 2014, is vacated and re-set to February 20, 2 2014; the dispositive motion cut-off date of March 28, 2014, is vacated and re-set for 3 April 25, 2014. 4 Dated: October 21, 2013 5 6 as2462.pi 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?