Asberry v. Cate et al
Filing
186
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 8/28/2014 ORDERING that within 14 days, plaintiff shall file his objections to the 7/21/14 findings and recommendations or clarify that one of the pleadings listed in this order is meant to be his objections. (Yin, K)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
TONY ASBERRY,
12
Plaintiff,
13
14
No. 2:11-cv-2462 KJM KJN P
v.
ORDER
MATTHEW CATE, et al.,
15
Defendants.
16
17
Plaintiff is a state prisoner, proceeding without counsel, with a civil rights action pursuant
18
to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On July 21, 2014, the undersigned recommended that defendants’ motion to
19
dismiss be granted. (ECF No. 178.) On August 25, 2014, plaintiff filed a pleading stating that on
20
July 31, 2014, he mailed his objections to the findings and recommendations to the court with a
21
motion to review the in-house camera footage. (ECF No. 185.)
22
On August 4, 2014, the court received plaintiff’s motion for the court to review the in-
23
house camera footage. (ECF No. 182.) On August 4, 2014, the court also received plaintiff’s
24
motion for clarifications and/or corrections. (ECF No. 183.) The court has not received from
25
plaintiff a pleading labeled as objections to the findings and recommendations filed July 21, 2014.
26
////
27
////
28
////
1
1
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that within fourteen days of the date of this
2
order, plaintiff shall file his objections to the July 21, 2014 findings and recommendations or
3
clarify that one of the pleadings listed above is meant to be his objections.
4
Dated: August 28, 2014
5
6
As2462.cla
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?