Asberry v. Cate et al
Filing
33
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 3/22/12 ORDERING that 28 motion for leave to amend is DENIED; 29 Motion for a court order is DENIED. (Dillon, M)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
TONY ASBERRY,
Plaintiff,
11
12
No. 2: 11-cv-2462 KJM KJN P
vs.
13
MATTHEW CATE, et al.,
14
Defendants.
15
16
17
ORDER
/
Plaintiff is a state prisoner, proceeding without counsel, with this civil rights
action seeking relief pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983.
18
On March 2, 2012, plaintiff filed a motion for leave to amend his complaint.
19
Plaintiff’s motion was not, however, accompanied by a proposed amended complaint. As a
20
litigant proceeding in forma pauperis, plaintiff’s pleadings are subject to evaluation by this court
21
pursuant to the in forma pauperis statute. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915. Because plaintiff did not
22
submit a proposed amended complaint, the court is unable to evaluate it. Plaintiff’s motion for
23
leave to amend must therefore be denied.
24
On March 2, 2012, plaintiff submitted seven copies of his second amended
25
complaint necessary to effect service. By separate order, the undersigned directs the U.S.
26
Marshal to serve the second amended complaint.
1
1
On March 2, 2012, plaintiff also filed a motion for an order directing prison
2
officials to make copies of the second amended complaint. Because plaintiff submitted the
3
copies of the second amended complaint necessary to effect service, the March 2, 2012 motion
4
for an order directing prison officials to make these copies is denied as moot.
5
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
6
1. Plaintiff’s March 2, 2012 motion for leave to amend (Dkt. No. 28) is denied;
7
2. Plaintiff’s March 2, 2012 motion for a court order (Dkt. No. 29) is denied.
8
DATED: March 22, 2012
9
_____________________________________
KENDALL J. NEWMAN
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
10
11
12
as2462.ord
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?