Asberry v. Cate et al

Filing 75

ORDER signed by Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 9/11/2012 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 56 are ADOPTED in FULL; and plaintiff's 50 Motion for Preliminary Injunction is DENIED. (Reader, L)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 TONY ASBERRY, Plaintiff, 11 12 No. CIV S-11-2462 KJM KJN P vs. 13 MATTHEW CATE, et al., 14 Defendants. / 15 16 ORDER Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action 17 seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate 18 Judge as provided by 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. 19 On July 23, 2012, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations, 20 which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to 21 the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Plaintiff has filed 22 objections to the findings and recommendations. 23 In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 24 304, this court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the file, 25 the court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by the 26 proper analysis. 1 1 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 2 1. The findings and recommendations filed July 23, 2012 (Dkt. No. 56) are 3 4 5 adopted in full; and 2. Plaintiff’s motion for a preliminary injunction (Dkt. No. 50) is denied. DATED: September 11, 2012. 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?