Wagner et al v. City of Stockton Police Department, et al

Filing 11

ORDER to SHOW CAUSE signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr on 1/19/12 ORDERING that the Status Conference scheduled for hearing on 1/30/12 is CONTINUED to 3/26/2012 at 09:00 AM. A joint Status Report shall be filed no later than fourteen (14) days pr ior. To avoid dismissal, on or before 1/27/2012, Plantiffs shall file proof of service for defendant Blair Ulring or a filing with sufficient explanation why service was not effected within Rule 4(m)'s prescribed service period. (Mena-Sanchez, L)

1
2
3
4
5

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

6

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

7
8

THOMAS WAGNER, TAMMY WAGNER,
Plaintiffs,

9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19

v.
CITY OF STOCKTON, a municipal
corporation; BLAIR ULRING, in
his capacity of chief of
police for CITY OF STOCKTON;
MARK BERG (Stockton Police
Department Star #0486); JEFFERY
TACAZON (Stockton Police
Department Star #1395); MICHELLE
GUTHRIE (Stockton Police
Department Star #1524); DOES
1-20 inclusive, individually and
in their capacities as POLICE
OFFICERS for the CITY OF
STOCKTON,
Defendants.
________________________________

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

2:11-cv-02490-GEB-EFB
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE AND
CONTINUING STATUS (PRETRIAL
SCHEDULING) CONFERENCE; FED.
R. CIV. P. 4(M) NOTICE

20

Defendants’ Status Report filed January 17, 2012, reveals this

21

case is not ready to be scheduled. Therefore, the Status (Pretrial

22

Scheduling) Conference scheduled for hearing on January 30, 2012, is

23

continued to March 26, 2012, at 9:00 a.m. A joint status report shall be

24

filed no later than fourteen (14) days prior.

25

Further, Plaintiffs are notified under Rule 4(m) of the

26

Federal Rules of Civil Procedure that failure to serve Defendant Blair

27

Ulring with process within the 120 day period prescribed in that Rule

28

may result in his dismissal. To avoid dismissal, on or before January

1

1

27, 2012, Plaintiffs shall file proof of service for this defendant or

2

a filing with sufficient explanation why service was not effected within

3

Rule 4(m)’s prescribed service period.

4

Dated:

January 19, 2012

5
6
7

GARLAND E. BURRELL, JR.
United States District Judge

8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2