Wagner et al v. City of Stockton Police Department, et al

Filing 26

ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 7/17/15 ORDERING that the Clerk reassign this case to the Honorable Edmund F. Brennan, Magistrate Judge.The parties shall take note that all documents hereafter filed with the Clerk shall bear case number 2:11-cv-02490- EFB. All currently scheduled dates presently set before Judge Nunley are hereby VACATED. (Kastilahn, A)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 THOMAS WAGNER and TAMMY WAGNER, No. 2:11-cv-02490-TLN-EFB 12 Plaintiffs, 13 ORDER v. 14 15 CITY OF STOCKTON POLICE DEPARTMENT, et al., 16 Defendants. 17 18 Each of the parties in the above-captioned case have 19 consented to allow the assigned magistrate judge to preside over 20 the jury trial in this case pursuant to the Joint Status Report 21 filed on June 25, 2015. See 28 U.S.C. ยง 636(c). 22 E.D. Cal. R. 305, both the district court judge assigned to the 23 case and the magistrate judge must approve the reference to the 24 magistrate judge. 25 According to The undersigned has reviewed the file herein and recommends 26 that the above-captioned case be assigned and referred to the 27 magistrate judge for all further proceedings and entry of final 28 judgment. 1 1 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court reassign 2 this case to the Honorable Edmund F. Brennan, Magistrate Judge. 3 The parties shall take note that all documents hereafter filed 4 with the Clerk of the Court shall bear case number 2:11-cv-02490- 5 EFB. 6 Nunley are hereby VACATED. 7 All currently scheduled dates presently set before Judge DATED: July 17, 2015 8 9 10 11 12 13 Having also reviewed the file, I accept reference of this 14 case for all further proceedings and entry of final judgment. 15 DATED: July 28, 2015 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?