Wagner et al v. City of Stockton Police Department, et al
Filing
26
ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 7/17/15 ORDERING that the Clerk reassign this case to the Honorable Edmund F. Brennan, Magistrate Judge.The parties shall take note that all documents hereafter filed with the Clerk shall bear case number 2:11-cv-02490- EFB. All currently scheduled dates presently set before Judge Nunley are hereby VACATED. (Kastilahn, A)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
THOMAS WAGNER and TAMMY
WAGNER,
No.
2:11-cv-02490-TLN-EFB
12
Plaintiffs,
13
ORDER
v.
14
15
CITY OF STOCKTON POLICE
DEPARTMENT, et al.,
16
Defendants.
17
18
Each of the parties in the above-captioned case have
19
consented to allow the assigned magistrate judge to preside over
20
the jury trial in this case pursuant to the Joint Status Report
21
filed on June 25, 2015. See 28 U.S.C. ยง 636(c).
22
E.D. Cal. R. 305, both the district court judge assigned to the
23
case and the magistrate judge must approve the reference to the
24
magistrate judge.
25
According to
The undersigned has reviewed the file herein and recommends
26
that the above-captioned case be assigned and referred to the
27
magistrate judge for all further proceedings and entry of final
28
judgment.
1
1
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court reassign
2
this case to the Honorable Edmund F. Brennan, Magistrate Judge.
3
The parties shall take note that all documents hereafter filed
4
with the Clerk of the Court shall bear case number 2:11-cv-02490-
5
EFB.
6
Nunley are hereby VACATED.
7
All currently scheduled dates presently set before Judge
DATED: July 17, 2015
8
9
10
11
12
13
Having also reviewed the file, I accept reference of this
14
case for all further proceedings and entry of final judgment.
15
DATED:
July 28, 2015
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?