Wagner et al v. City of Stockton Police Department, et al

Filing 47

STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 01/17/17 ORDERING that this entire action be DISMISSED with prejudice, each party to bear his/her/its own fees and costs, including without limitation attorneys' fees, pursuant to FRCP Rule 41(a)(2). CASE CLOSED (Benson, A)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 DANA A. SUNTAG, State Bar Number: 125127 JOSHUA J. STEVENS, State Bar Number: 238105 HERUM\CRABTREE\SUNTAG A California Professional Corporation 5757 Pacific Avenue, Suite 222 Stockton, California 95207 Telephone: (209) 472-7700 Facsimile: (209) 472-7986 dsuntag@herumcrabtree.com jstevens@herumcrabtree.com 6 Attorneys for All Defendants 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 THOMAS WAGNER, et al, 11 12 13 14 Plaintiff, v. CITY OF STOCKTON, et al., Defendants. 15 16 17 18 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 1 STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR DISMISSAL Case No.: 2:11-CV-02490-EFB STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR DISMISSAL OF ENTIRE CASE WITH PREJUDICE IT IS STIPULATED AND AGREED, by all the remaining parties to this 1 2 action, through their undersigned counsel of record, that this entire action be dismissed 3 with prejudice, each party to bear his/her/its own fees and costs, including without 4 limitation attorneys’ fees, pursuant to Rule 41(a)(2) of the Federal Rules of Civil 5 Procedure. 6 Dated: January 11, 2017 7 By: ____/s/ Dana A. Suntag____________ DANA A. SUNTAG Attorneys for All Defendants 8 9 10 Dated: January 11, 2017 11 13 15 LAW OFFICES OF CHE L. HASHIM By: ____/s/ Che L. Hashim________________ CHE L. HASHIM Attorneys for All Plaintiffs ORDER 12 14 HERUM\CRABTREE\SUNTAG A California Professional Corporation IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: January 17, 2017. 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR DISMISSAL

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?