Waters v. Davey et al

Filing 11

FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 7/18/2012 RECOMMENDING that this action be dismissed. Referred to Judge John A. Mendez; Objections due within 14 days. (Yin, K)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10

MICHAEL LYNN WATERS,

11

Plaintiff,

12

vs.

13

No. 2:11-cv-02510-JAM-DAD P

L. DAVEY, et al.,

14

Defendants.

15
16

FINDINGS & RECOMMENDATIONS
/

By orders filed May 9, 2012 and June 14, 2012, plaintiff was ordered to file a

17

complaint, as well as, either the filing fee or an application to proceed in forma pauperis. The

18

time for filing the required documents and/or filing fee has passed, and plaintiff has not complied

19

with the court’s orders.

20
21
22

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed
without prejudice. See Local Rule 110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).
These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District

23

Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen

24

days after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written

25

objections with the court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s

26

Findings and Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the
1

1

specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951

2

F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).

3

DATED: July 18, 2012.

4
5
6
7

DAD:4
wat2510.fta.fifp

8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
2