Waters v. Davey et al
Filing
20
FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 11/13/13 recommending that this action be dismissed without prejudice. Referred to Judge John A. Mendez. Objections due within 14 days. (Plummer, M)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
MICHAEL LYNN WATERS,
12
No. 2:11-cv-02510 JAM DAD P
Plaintiff,
13
v.
14
L. DAVEY, et al.,
15
FINDINGS & RECOMMENDATIONS
Defendants.
16
By order filed September 30, 2013, plaintiff’s complaint was dismissed and thirty days
17
18
leave to file an amended complaint was granted. Thirty days from that date have now passed, and
19
plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint, or otherwise responded to the court’s order.
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without
20
21
prejudice. See Local Rule 110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).
22
These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge
23
assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days
24
after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections
25
with the court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings
26
and Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the specified
27
/////
28
/////
1
1
time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153
2
(9th Cir. 1991).
3
Dated: November 13, 2013
4
5
6
DAD:4
wat2510.fta
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?