Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Trinity Protection Services, Inc.
Filing
19
CONSENT DECREE; ORDER signed by Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 8/22/12. CASE CLOSED. (Matson, R)
1
6
WILLIAM R. TAMAYO, SBN 084965
JONATHAN T. PECK, 12303 (VA)
RAYMOND T. CHEUNG, SBN 176086
U.S. EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION
San Francisco District Office
350 The Embarcadero, Suite 500
San Francisco, CA 94105-1260
Telephone No. (415) 625-5649
Fax No. (415) 625-5657
E-mail: raymond.cheung@eeoc.gov
7
Attorneys for Plaintiff EEOC
8
DANIELLE OCHS-TILLOTSON (State Bar No. 178677)
dot@ogletreedeakins.com
CAROLYN B. HALL (State Bar No. 212311)
carolyn.hall@ogletreedeakins.com
OGLETREE, DEAKINS, NASH, SMOAK & STEWART, P.C.
Steuart Tower, Suite 1300
One Market Plaza
San Francisco, CA 94105
Telephone:
415.442.4810
Facsimile:
415.442.4870
2
3
4
5
9
10
11
12
13
14
Attorneys for Defendant
TRINITY PROTECTION SERVICES, INC.
15
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
16
17
18
19 EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY
COMMISSION
20
Plaintiff,
21
v.
22
TRINITY PROTECTION SERVICES, INC.,
23
Defendant.
24
Case No. CV 11-cv-02535-KJM-DAD
CONSENT DECREE; ORDER
Judge: Hon. Kimberly J. Mueller
25
///
26
27
28
///
///
EEOC v. Trinity Pro. Serv., Inc.
CV-11-02535 KJM-DAD
1
Consent Decree &
Order
1
I.
2
INTRODUCTION
Plaintiff United States Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (“EEOC” or
3 “Commission”) filed this suit on behalf of Charging Party William Clark alleging that his employer
4 Defendant Trinity Protection Services (“Trinity”) subjected him to disparate treatment due to his
5
age and gender [male], in violation of Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967, as
6
amended (“ADEA”), and Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended (“Title VII”),
7
respectively. Defendant Trinity has denied the above allegations. The Commission and Trinity
8
now seek to resolve this action without the expenditure of additional resources and expenses in
9
contested litigation.
10
The Court has reviewed this Consent Decree in light of the pleadings, the record herein, the
11
applicable law, and now approves this Consent Decree.
12
II.
13
NON-ADMISSION OF LIABILITY
This Consent Decree is not an adjudication or finding on the merits of this case and shall
14 not be construed as an admission of a violation of the ADEA or Title VII by Trinity.
15 III.
GENERAL PROVISIONS
16
1.
17
Court retains jurisdiction over this Consent Decree during its term.
18
19
This Court has jurisdiction over the subject matter and the parties to this action. This
2.
This Consent Decree constitutes a full and final resolution of the Commission’s
claim against Trinity in this action.
20
3.
This Consent Decree will become effective upon its entry by the Court.
21
4.
This Consent Decree is final and binding upon the parties to it, their successors and
22 assigns.
23
5.
24 IV.
GENERAL INJUNCTIVE RELIEF
25
6.
Each party shall bear its own costs and attorney’s fees in this action.
Trinity and its current officers, agents, and employees shall comply with all
26 requirements of the ADEA and Title VII with respect to providing a workplace free of age and
27 gender discrimination.
28
7.
Trinity and its current officers, agents and employees shall comply with all
2
EEOC v. Trinity Pro. Serv., Inc.
Consent Decree &
CV-11-02535 KJM-DAD
Order
1
requirements of the ADEA and Title VII with respect to providing a workplace free of retaliation.
2
8.
Trinity and its current officers, agents, and employees shall not retaliate against any
3 employee or former employee for having testified or participated in any manner in the
4 Commission’s investigation and the proceedings in this case.
5 V.
SPECIAL INJUNCTIVE RELIEF
6
9.
Trinity will provide a four-hour training session on ADEA and Title VII to its
7
president and CEO within 60-days of entry of this Consent Decree. Said training will include,
8
among other topics, what a manager or supervisor should do when an employee complains of age
9
or gender discrimination, how to investigate such complaints, and the obligations of managers and
10
supervisors not to retaliate against employees who make such complaints. The training shall be
11
conducted by person(s) versed and experienced in the area of employment law. The cost of the
12
training shall be borne by Trinity.
13
10.
Within 15-days following said training, Trinity shall mail to counsel for the
14
Commission a report containing the date of the training and copies of all materials distributed at
15
the training.
16
11.
Semi-annually [every six months], for the duration of this Consent Decree, Trinity
17
shall submit copies of any complaints of age or sex discrimination, including their resolution, to
18
the Commission’s attorney.
19
12.
Defendant Trinity shall expunge from Charging Party William Clark’s personnel
20
file any reference to his charge of discrimination and this lawsuit. In the event that Trinity
21
receives a reference check from a prospective employer, Trinity shall disclose only Mr. Clark’s
22
dates of employment, employment held and final rate of pay.
23
VI.
24
MONETARY RELIEF
13.
Within fifteen (15) days of the entry of this Consent Decree, Trinity shall pay the
25
sum of $5,000.00 to William Clark as compensatory damages and in satisfaction of the
26
Commission’s claims against Defendant Trinity as set forth in its Complaint. This sum will be
27
paid by check directly to Mr. Clark, and will be sent to him via certified mail, at the address to be
28
provided to Trinity by the Commission. A copy of said check and its transmittal letter will be sent
3
EEOC v. Trinity Pro. Serv., Inc.
Consent Decree &
CV-11-02535 KJM-DAD
Order
1
to the Commission’s counsel at the San Francisco District Office.
2
14.
Trinity shall cause to be issued an IRS Form 1099-misc to William Clark for the
3
monetary relief paid; box 3 on IRS Form 1099 shall be completed by Trinity. No withholding
4
taxes shall be deducted from the amount.
5
VII.
6
EXPIRATION OF CONSENT DECREE
15.
This Consent Decree constitutes a full and final resolution of all the Commission’s
7
claims against Trinity in this action. This Consent Decree will expire three (3) years after its entry,
8
provided that Trinity has substantially complied with the terms of this Consent Decree. Trinity
9
will be deemed to have complied substantially if the Court has not made any findings or orders
10
during the term of the Consent Decree that Trinity has failed to comply with any of the terms of
11
this Decree.
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
On behalf of Plaintiff U.S. EEOC
On behalf of Defendant Trinity Protection
Services, Inc.
Dated: July 26, 2012
Dated: July 26, 2012
U. S. EQUAL EMPLOYMENT
OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION
_/s/_____________________________
William R. Tamayo, Regional Attorney
OGLETREE, DEAKINS, NASH, SMOAK &
STEWART, P.C.
_/s/________________________________
Danielle Ochs-Tillotson
Attorney for Defendant
_/s/____________________________
Jonathan T. Peck, Supervisory Trial Attorney
_ /s/____________________________
Raymond T. Cheung, Senior Trial Attorney
Attorneys for Plaintiff
22
GENERAL ORDER 45 ATTESTATION
23
24
I, Raymond T. Cheung, am the ECF User whose ID and password are being used to file this
25
Consent Decree and [Proposed] Order. In compliance with General Order 45, X.B., I hereby attest
26
that Danielle Ochs-Tillotson has concurred in this filing.
27
Date: July 26, 2012
By:
/s/ Raymond T. Cheung
RAYMOND T. CHEUNG
28
EEOC v. Trinity Pro. Serv., Inc.
CV-11-02535 KJM-DAD
4
Consent Decree &
Order
1
2
3
ORDER
IT IS SO ORDERED:
4
5
Dated: August 22, 2012.
6
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
EEOC v. Trinity Pro. Serv., Inc.
CV-11-02535 KJM-DAD
5
Consent Decree &
Order
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?