Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Trinity Protection Services, Inc.

Filing 19

CONSENT DECREE; ORDER signed by Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 8/22/12. CASE CLOSED. (Matson, R)

Download PDF
1 6 WILLIAM R. TAMAYO, SBN 084965 JONATHAN T. PECK, 12303 (VA) RAYMOND T. CHEUNG, SBN 176086 U.S. EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION San Francisco District Office 350 The Embarcadero, Suite 500 San Francisco, CA 94105-1260 Telephone No. (415) 625-5649 Fax No. (415) 625-5657 E-mail: raymond.cheung@eeoc.gov 7 Attorneys for Plaintiff EEOC 8 DANIELLE OCHS-TILLOTSON (State Bar No. 178677) dot@ogletreedeakins.com CAROLYN B. HALL (State Bar No. 212311) carolyn.hall@ogletreedeakins.com OGLETREE, DEAKINS, NASH, SMOAK & STEWART, P.C. Steuart Tower, Suite 1300 One Market Plaza San Francisco, CA 94105 Telephone: 415.442.4810 Facsimile: 415.442.4870 2 3 4 5 9 10 11 12 13 14 Attorneys for Defendant TRINITY PROTECTION SERVICES, INC. 15 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 16 17 18 19 EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION 20 Plaintiff, 21 v. 22 TRINITY PROTECTION SERVICES, INC., 23 Defendant. 24 Case No. CV 11-cv-02535-KJM-DAD CONSENT DECREE; ORDER Judge: Hon. Kimberly J. Mueller 25 /// 26 27 28 /// /// EEOC v. Trinity Pro. Serv., Inc. CV-11-02535 KJM-DAD 1 Consent Decree & Order 1 I. 2 INTRODUCTION Plaintiff United States Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (“EEOC” or 3 “Commission”) filed this suit on behalf of Charging Party William Clark alleging that his employer 4 Defendant Trinity Protection Services (“Trinity”) subjected him to disparate treatment due to his 5 age and gender [male], in violation of Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967, as 6 amended (“ADEA”), and Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended (“Title VII”), 7 respectively. Defendant Trinity has denied the above allegations. The Commission and Trinity 8 now seek to resolve this action without the expenditure of additional resources and expenses in 9 contested litigation. 10 The Court has reviewed this Consent Decree in light of the pleadings, the record herein, the 11 applicable law, and now approves this Consent Decree. 12 II. 13 NON-ADMISSION OF LIABILITY This Consent Decree is not an adjudication or finding on the merits of this case and shall 14 not be construed as an admission of a violation of the ADEA or Title VII by Trinity. 15 III. GENERAL PROVISIONS 16 1. 17 Court retains jurisdiction over this Consent Decree during its term. 18 19 This Court has jurisdiction over the subject matter and the parties to this action. This 2. This Consent Decree constitutes a full and final resolution of the Commission’s claim against Trinity in this action. 20 3. This Consent Decree will become effective upon its entry by the Court. 21 4. This Consent Decree is final and binding upon the parties to it, their successors and 22 assigns. 23 5. 24 IV. GENERAL INJUNCTIVE RELIEF 25 6. Each party shall bear its own costs and attorney’s fees in this action. Trinity and its current officers, agents, and employees shall comply with all 26 requirements of the ADEA and Title VII with respect to providing a workplace free of age and 27 gender discrimination. 28 7. Trinity and its current officers, agents and employees shall comply with all 2 EEOC v. Trinity Pro. Serv., Inc. Consent Decree & CV-11-02535 KJM-DAD Order 1 requirements of the ADEA and Title VII with respect to providing a workplace free of retaliation. 2 8. Trinity and its current officers, agents, and employees shall not retaliate against any 3 employee or former employee for having testified or participated in any manner in the 4 Commission’s investigation and the proceedings in this case. 5 V. SPECIAL INJUNCTIVE RELIEF 6 9. Trinity will provide a four-hour training session on ADEA and Title VII to its 7 president and CEO within 60-days of entry of this Consent Decree. Said training will include, 8 among other topics, what a manager or supervisor should do when an employee complains of age 9 or gender discrimination, how to investigate such complaints, and the obligations of managers and 10 supervisors not to retaliate against employees who make such complaints. The training shall be 11 conducted by person(s) versed and experienced in the area of employment law. The cost of the 12 training shall be borne by Trinity. 13 10. Within 15-days following said training, Trinity shall mail to counsel for the 14 Commission a report containing the date of the training and copies of all materials distributed at 15 the training. 16 11. Semi-annually [every six months], for the duration of this Consent Decree, Trinity 17 shall submit copies of any complaints of age or sex discrimination, including their resolution, to 18 the Commission’s attorney. 19 12. Defendant Trinity shall expunge from Charging Party William Clark’s personnel 20 file any reference to his charge of discrimination and this lawsuit. In the event that Trinity 21 receives a reference check from a prospective employer, Trinity shall disclose only Mr. Clark’s 22 dates of employment, employment held and final rate of pay. 23 VI. 24 MONETARY RELIEF 13. Within fifteen (15) days of the entry of this Consent Decree, Trinity shall pay the 25 sum of $5,000.00 to William Clark as compensatory damages and in satisfaction of the 26 Commission’s claims against Defendant Trinity as set forth in its Complaint. This sum will be 27 paid by check directly to Mr. Clark, and will be sent to him via certified mail, at the address to be 28 provided to Trinity by the Commission. A copy of said check and its transmittal letter will be sent 3 EEOC v. Trinity Pro. Serv., Inc. Consent Decree & CV-11-02535 KJM-DAD Order 1 to the Commission’s counsel at the San Francisco District Office. 2 14. Trinity shall cause to be issued an IRS Form 1099-misc to William Clark for the 3 monetary relief paid; box 3 on IRS Form 1099 shall be completed by Trinity. No withholding 4 taxes shall be deducted from the amount. 5 VII. 6 EXPIRATION OF CONSENT DECREE 15. This Consent Decree constitutes a full and final resolution of all the Commission’s 7 claims against Trinity in this action. This Consent Decree will expire three (3) years after its entry, 8 provided that Trinity has substantially complied with the terms of this Consent Decree. Trinity 9 will be deemed to have complied substantially if the Court has not made any findings or orders 10 during the term of the Consent Decree that Trinity has failed to comply with any of the terms of 11 this Decree. 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 On behalf of Plaintiff U.S. EEOC On behalf of Defendant Trinity Protection Services, Inc. Dated: July 26, 2012 Dated: July 26, 2012 U. S. EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION _/s/_____________________________ William R. Tamayo, Regional Attorney OGLETREE, DEAKINS, NASH, SMOAK & STEWART, P.C. _/s/________________________________ Danielle Ochs-Tillotson Attorney for Defendant _/s/____________________________ Jonathan T. Peck, Supervisory Trial Attorney _ /s/____________________________ Raymond T. Cheung, Senior Trial Attorney Attorneys for Plaintiff 22 GENERAL ORDER 45 ATTESTATION 23 24 I, Raymond T. Cheung, am the ECF User whose ID and password are being used to file this 25 Consent Decree and [Proposed] Order. In compliance with General Order 45, X.B., I hereby attest 26 that Danielle Ochs-Tillotson has concurred in this filing. 27 Date: July 26, 2012 By: /s/ Raymond T. Cheung RAYMOND T. CHEUNG 28 EEOC v. Trinity Pro. Serv., Inc. CV-11-02535 KJM-DAD 4 Consent Decree & Order 1 2 3 ORDER IT IS SO ORDERED: 4 5 Dated: August 22, 2012. 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 EEOC v. Trinity Pro. Serv., Inc. CV-11-02535 KJM-DAD 5 Consent Decree & Order

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?