The Arc of California, et al v. Douglas, et al

Filing 129

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER signed by Chief Judge Morrison C. England, Jr on 10/16/13 ORDERING that Defendants' MOTION for Protective Order 107 is DENIED as moot. (Mena-Sanchez, L)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11
12

THE ARC OF CALIFORNIA; UNITED
CEREBRAL PALSY ASSOCIATION
OF SAN DIEGO,

13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22

No. 2:11-cv-02545-MCE-CKD

Plaintiffs,

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

v.
TOBY DOUGLAS, in his official
capacity as Director of the California
Department of Health Care Services;
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF
HEALTH CARE SERVICES; TERRI
DELGADILLO, in her official capacity
as Director of the California
Department of Developmental
Services; CALIFORNIA
DEPARTMENT OF
DEVELOPMENTAL SERVICES; and
DOES 1-100, inclusive,
Defendants.

23
24
25

By Memorandum and Order filed July 1, 2013, this Court granted in part and
denied in part Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 53). A recent review of the

26
docket in this matter indicates that Defendants’ Motion for Protective Order (ECF No.
27
28

107) technically remains pending.
1

1

Th motion sought to stay initial disclosures and all othe discover pending a ruling on
hat
s
s
er
ry

2

the Motion to Dismiss. Since that ruling has iin fact been issued, De
o
n
efendants’ Motion for

3

Pr
rotective Or
rder (ECF No. 107) is DENIED as moot.1
N

4
IT IS SO ORDER
S
RED.
5
6

ated: October 16, 201
13
Da

7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
1

28

Because oral argument wa not of mate
B
as
erial assistanc the Court ordered this m
ce,
matter submit
tted on the
bri
iefs. E.D. Ca Local Rule 230(g).
al.

2