Robinson v. Kate et al

Filing 41

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 8/19/13 ORDERING that within 30 days of the date of this order, plaintiff shall file an opposition, if any, to the pending motion to dismiss.(Dillon, M)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

ANDRE JAMAL ROBINSON,

12

Plaintiff,

13
14

No. 2:11-cv-2555 MCE AC P

v.

ORDER

MATTHEW KATE, et al.,

15

Defendants.

16
On June 11, 2013, defendants filed a motion to dismiss pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil

17
18

Procedure 12(b)(6). Plaintiff has not opposed the motion. Local Rule 230(l) provides in part:

19

“Failure of the responding party to file written opposition or to file a statement of no opposition

20

may be deemed a waiver of any opposition to the granting of the motion….” On January 5, 2012,

21

plaintiff was advised of the requirements for filing an opposition to a motion to dismiss and that

22

failure to oppose such a motion may be deemed a waiver of opposition to the motion. ECF No.

23

13. Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, within thirty days of the date of this

24

order, plaintiff shall file an opposition, if any, to the pending motion to dismiss. Failure to file an

25

////

26

////

27

////

28

////
1

1

opposition or a statement of non-opposition will be deemed as consent to have the pending

2

motion granted.

3

DATED: August 19, 2013

4
5
6
7
8
AC:ls//robi2555.nooppmtd

9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2