Robinson v. Kate et al

Filing 92

ORDER signed by Chief Judge Morrison C. England, Jr on 2/17/16: The Findings and Recommendations 91 are ADOPTED IN FULL. Plaintiff's Motion for Preliminary Injunctive Relief 90 is DENIED. (Kaminski, H)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

ANDRE JAMAL ROBINSON,

12

Plaintiff,

13
14

No. 2:11-cv-2555 MCE AC P

v.

ORDER

MATTHEW CATE, et al.,

15

Defendants.

16
Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, filed this civil rights action seeking relief

17
18

under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to

19

28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.

20

On January 14, 2016, the magistrate judge filed Findings and Recommendations herein

21

which were served on all parties and which contained notice that any objections to the Findings

22

and Recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. ECF No. 91. No party has filed

23

objections to the Findings and Recommendations.
The Court has reviewed the file and finds the Findings and Recommendations to be

24
25

supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY

26

ORDERED that:

27

///

28

///
1

1
2

1. The Findings and Recommendations filed January 14, 2016 (ECF No. 91) are
ADOPTED IN FULL.

3

2. Plaintiff’s Motion for Preliminary Injunctive Relief (ECF No. 90) is DENIED.

4

IT IS SO ORDERED.

5

Dated: February 17, 2016

6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2