Robinson v. Kate et al

Filing 96

ORDER ADOPTING 94 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS in full signed by Chief Judge Morrison C. England, Jr. on 04/20/16 ORDERING that plaintiff's 93 Motion for Preliminary Injunction is DENIED. (Benson, A)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

ANDRE JAMAL ROBINSON,

12

Plaintiff,

13
14

No. 2:11-cv-2555 MCE AC P

v.

ORDER

MATTHEW CATE, et al.,

15

Defendants.

16
Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action

17
18

seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States

19

Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.
On March 14, 2016, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations

20
21

herein which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any

22

objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days.

23

ECF No. 94. Plaintiff has filed objections to the findings and recommendations. ECF

24

No. 95

25

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 304,

26

this Court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the

27

entire file, the Court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the

28

record and by proper analysis.
1

1

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

2

1. The findings and recommendations filed March 14, 2016 (ECF No. 94), are

3

adopted in full; and

4

2. Plaintiff’s motion for preliminary injunctive relief (ECF No. 93) is denied.

5

IT IS SO ORDERED.

6

Dated: April 20, 2016

7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2