Lasher v. Miranda et al

Filing 50

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 10/24/2012 DENYING plaintiff's 39 motion for transcripts. (Yin, K)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10

GARY LASHER,

11
12
13
14

Plaintiff,
vs.
R. MIRANDA, et al.,
Defendants.

15
16

No. 2: 11-cv-2564 WBS KJN P

ORDER
/

Plaintiff is a state prisoner, proceeding without counsel, with a civil rights action

17

pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Pending before the court is plaintiff’s September 10, 2012 motion

18

for transcripts. For the following reasons, this motion is denied.

19

In the pending motion, plaintiff requests that he be allowed to review the

20

deposition transcript pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 30(e). On October 18, 2012,

21

the undersigned ordered defendants to inform the court whether the deposition transcript

22

contained plaintiff’s request for review.

23

On October 23, 2012, defendants filed a response to the October 18, 2012 order.

24

Defendants state that Tri County Court Reporting sent plaintiff a copy of the deposition transcript

25

to review. Because plaintiff has received the deposition transcript to review, his motion for

26

transcripts is denied as moot.
1

1

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff’s motion for transcripts

2

(Dkt. No. 39) is denied.

3

DATED: October 24, 2012

4
5

_____________________________________
KENDALL J. NEWMAN
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

6
7

lash2564.tra

8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
2