Lasher v. Miranda et al

Filing 76

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 12/02/13 ordering the pretrial order is amended to reflect that plaintiff shall call no inmate witnesses and shall offer not exhibits. Plaintiff's motion for witnesses 71 is denied to the extent plaintiff requests to call inmate witnesses. (Plummer, M)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

GARY LASHER,

12

Plaintiff,

13
14

No. 2: 11-cv-2564 WBS KJN P

v.

ORDER

R. MIRANDA, et al.,

15

Defendants.

16
Plaintiff is a state prisoner, proceeding without counsel, with a civil rights action pursuant

17
18

to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On November 5, 2013, the court issued a pretrial order. The pretrial order

19

directed plaintiff to file a supplemental pretrial statement within fourteen days demonstrating that

20

his proposed inmate witnesses have actual knowledge of the relevant facts. The pretrial order

21

also directed plaintiff to list his proposed exhibits in his supplemental pretrial statement.

22

Fourteen days passed and plaintiff did not file a supplemental pretrial statement.

23

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

24

1.

The pretrial order is amended to reflect that plaintiff shall call no inmate witnesses
and shall offer no exhibits; and

25
26

////

27

////

28

////
1

1

2. Plaintiff’s motion for witnesses (ECF No. 71) is denied to the extent plaintiff requests

2
3

to call inmate witnesses.
Dated: December 2, 2013

4
5

lash2564.ord

6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2