Suniga v. Van Sant et al

Filing 23

ORDER denying 21 Motion to Appoint Counsel signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 08/30/12. (Plummer, M)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10

ALFRED SUNIGA,
Plaintiff,

11
vs.

12
13

No. 2:11-cv-2572 CKD P

J. VAN SANT, et al.,
Defendants.

14

ORDER
/

15

Plaintiff has requested the appointment of counsel. The United States Supreme

16
17

Court has ruled that district courts lack authority to require counsel to represent indigent

18

prisoners in § 1983 cases. Mallard v. United States Dist. Court, 490 U.S. 296, 298 (1989). In

19

certain exceptional circumstances, the court may request the voluntary assistance of counsel

20

pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(1). Terrell v. Brewer, 935 F.2d 1015, 1017 (9th Cir. 1991);

21

Wood v. Housewright, 900 F.2d 1332, 1335-36 (9th Cir. 1990). In the present case, the court

22

does not find the required exceptional circumstances. Plaintiff’s motion for the appointment of

23

counsel will therefore be denied.

24

/////

25

/////

26

/////
1

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff’s motion for the

1
2
3

appointment of counsel (Docket No. 21) is denied.
Dated: August 30, 2012

4

_____________________________________
CAROLYN K. DELANEY
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

5
6
7
8
9
/mp

10

suni2572.31(2)

11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
2