Suniga v. Van Sant et al

Filing 23

ORDER denying 21 Motion to Appoint Counsel signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 08/30/12. (Plummer, M)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ALFRED SUNIGA, Plaintiff, 11 vs. 12 13 No. 2:11-cv-2572 CKD P J. VAN SANT, et al., Defendants. 14 ORDER / 15 Plaintiff has requested the appointment of counsel. The United States Supreme 16 17 Court has ruled that district courts lack authority to require counsel to represent indigent 18 prisoners in § 1983 cases. Mallard v. United States Dist. Court, 490 U.S. 296, 298 (1989). In 19 certain exceptional circumstances, the court may request the voluntary assistance of counsel 20 pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(1). Terrell v. Brewer, 935 F.2d 1015, 1017 (9th Cir. 1991); 21 Wood v. Housewright, 900 F.2d 1332, 1335-36 (9th Cir. 1990). In the present case, the court 22 does not find the required exceptional circumstances. Plaintiff’s motion for the appointment of 23 counsel will therefore be denied. 24 ///// 25 ///// 26 ///// 1 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff’s motion for the 1 2 3 appointment of counsel (Docket No. 21) is denied. Dated: August 30, 2012 4 _____________________________________ CAROLYN K. DELANEY UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 5 6 7 8 9 /mp 10 suni2572.31(2) 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?