Tunstall v. State of California et al
Filing
7
ORDER AND FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 12/13/2011 ORDERING the clerk to assign a district judge to this case; and RECOMMENDING that this action be dismissed without prejudice. Assigned and Referred to Judge Kimberly J. Mueller; Objections due within 14 days. (Yin, K)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
ROBERT TUNSTALL,
11
Plaintiff,
12
13
14
vs.
STATE OF CALIFORNIA, et. al.,
ORDER &
Defendants.
15
16
No. CIV S-11-2587 GGH P
FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
/
By order filed October 21, 2011, plaintiff’s complaint was dismissed and twenty-
17
eight days leave to file an amended complaint was granted. Twenty-eight days from that date
18
have now expired, and plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint or otherwise responded to
19
the court’s order.
20
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk shall assign a district judge to this case.
21
IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without
22
23
prejudice. See Local Rule 110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).
These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District
24
Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of Title 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within
25
fourteen (14) days after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file
26
written objections with the court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate
1
1
Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” Any response to the objections shall be filed and
2
served within fourteen days after service of the objections. Plaintiff is advised that failure to file
3
objections within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order.
4
DATED: December 13, 2011
5
/s/ Gregory G. Hollows
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
6
7
GGH: AB
tuns2587.fta
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?