Gooden v. Suntrust Mortgage, Inc., et al.,

Filing 131

STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 9/15/14: The Court hereby extends the stay in this case until September 30, 2014. (Kaminski, H)

Download PDF
6 NIALL P. McCARTHY (SBN 160175) nmccarthy@cpmlegal.com JUSTIN T. BERGER (SBN 250346) jberger@cpmlegal.com ERIC J. BUESCHER (SBN 271323) ebuescher@cpmlegal.com COTCHETT, PITRE & McCARTHY, LLP 840 Malcolm Road Burlingame, CA 94010 Telephone: (650) 697-6000 Facsimile: (650) 692-3606 7 Attorneys for Plaintiffs and the Class 1 2 3 4 5 8 9 10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 11 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 12 13 SHEILA GOODEN, an individual; and MICHELLE HALL, an individual, Case No. 2:11-cv-02595-JAM-DAD 14 Plaintiffs, 15 STIPULATION AND REQUEST AND ORDER IN LIGHT OF SETTLEMENT v. 16 17 18 SUNTRUST MORTGAGE, INC., a Virginia corporation, Defendant. 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 STIPULATION AND REQUEST; [PROPOSED] ORDER; Case No. 2:11-cv02595-JAM-DAD 1 STIPULATION AND REQUEST 2 Plaintiffs SHEILA GOODEN and MICHELLE HALL (“Plaintiffs”), and Defendant 3 SUNTRUST MORTGAGE, INC., (“SunTrust”) have previously notified the Court that the 4 parties have reached a settlement in principle. 5 On September 2, 2014, the Court extended the stay of this case, asking that the parties, by 6 September 12, 2014, submit a statement informing the Court that the parties have successfully 7 completed settlement, requesting a further stay, or proposed a schedule to proceed with litigation. 8 See Dkt. No. 129. 9 The parties hereby notify the Court that they are still in the final stages of negotiating the 10 settlement. The parties again assure the Court that substantial progress has been made in 11 finalizing the documents needed to settle this case – with detailed deed in lieu documents having 12 been delivered which are now being considered with the settlement agreement also in the final 13 stages of review. The parties are now discussing final details of the settlement agreement and do 14 not at this time anticipate that a further extension of the stay will be necessary. The parties 15 therefore respectfully stipulate to and respectfully request that the Court enter an additional stay 16 until September 30, 2014 so that these issues can be addressed. 17 18 19 20 IT IS SO STIPULATED. Respectfully Submitted, Dated: September 12, 2014 COTCHETT, PITRE & McCARTHY, LLP 21 By: /s/ Eric J. Buescher NIALL P. McCARTHY JUSTIN T. BERGER ERIC J. BUESCHER 22 23 24 Attorneys for Plaintiffs 25 26 27 28 Dated: September 12, 2014 SEVERSON & WERSON By: /s/ Philip Barilovits PHILIP BARILOVITS Attorneys for Defendant STIPULATION AND REQUEST; [PROPOSED] ORDER; Case No. 2:11-cv02595-JAM-DAD 1 1 ORDER 2 Pursuant to the stipulation and request of the parties, and for good cause shown, the Court 3 hereby extends the stay in this case until September 30, 2014. By September 23, 2014, the parties 4 are to submit a statement informing the Court that the parties have successfully completed 5 settlement, requesting a further stay, or propose a schedule to proceed with litigation. 6 7 IT IS SO ORDERED. 8 9 10 Dated: 9/15/2014 /s/ John A. Mendez__________________ THE HONORABLE JOHN A. MENDEZ 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 STIPULATION AND REQUEST; [PROPOSED] ORDER; Case No. 2:11-cv02595-JAM-DAD 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?