Gooden v. Suntrust Mortgage, Inc., et al.,

Filing 44

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 1/4/2013. Plaintiff's 41 Motion to Compel is GRANTED subject to Protective Order already in place except as to redacted account number which may remain redacted. Defendant shall have 10 days from date of service of Order to produce Discovery responses at issue. Plaintiff's Request for Sanctions is DENIED. (Marciel, M)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10

SHEILA GOODEN, an individual,

11
12
13
14

Plaintiff,

Case No. 2:11-cv-02595-JAM-DAD

v.
SUNTRUST MORTGAGE, INC., a
Virginia Corporation; and
SUNTRUST BANK, INC., a Georgia
Corporation,

ORDER

15
16

Defendants.

17
18

/
This matter came before the court on January 4, 2013, for hearing of plaintiff

19

Sheila Gooden’s motion to compel discovery. (Doc. No. 41.) Attorney Eric Buescher appeared

20

on behalf of plaintiff Sheila Gooden and attorney Philip Barilovits appeared on behalf of

21

defendant Suntrust Mortgage, Inc.

22
23
24

Upon consideration of the parties’ arguments on file and at the hearing, and for
the reasons set forth in detail on the record, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
1. Plaintiff’s December 5, 2012 motion to compel, (Doc. No. 41), is granted

25

subject to the protective order already in place, except as to the redacted account numbers which

26

may remain redacted;
1

1
2
3
4

2. Defendant shall have ten days from the date of service of this order to produce
the discovery responses at issue; and
3. Plaintiff’s request for sanctions is denied.
DATED: January 4, 2013.

5
6
7
8
9

DAD:6
Ddad1\orders.civil\gooden2595.oah.010413

10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
2