Gooden v. Suntrust Mortgage, Inc., et al.,

Filing 71

ORDER signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 8/9/2013 GRANTING 70 REQUEST to Conditionally Seal Documents. (Donati, J)

Download PDF
Gooden v. Suntrust Mortgage, Inc., et al., Doc. 71 6 NIALL P. McCARTHY (SBN 160175) nmccarthy@cpmlegal.com JUSTIN T. BERGER (SBN 250346) jberger@cpmlegal.com ERIC J. BUESCHER (SBN 271323) ebuescher@cpmlegal.com COTCHETT, PITRE & McCARTHY, LLP 840 Malcolm Road Burlingame, California 94010 Telephone: (650) 697-6000 Facsimile: (650) 692-3606 7 Attorneys for Plaintiffs and the Class 1 2 3 4 5 8 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 10 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 12 SHEILA GOODEN, an individual; and MICHELLE HALL, an individual, Case No. 2:11-cv-02595-JAM-DAD 13 Plaintiffs, 14 vs. PLAINTIFFS’ REQUEST AND ORDER TO CONDITIONALLY SEAL DOCUMENTS 15 16 17 SUNTRUST MORTGAGE, INC., a Virginia corporation, Defendant. 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 PLAINTIFFS’ REQUEST AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONDITIONALLY SEAL DOCUMENTS; Case No. 2:11-cv-02595-JAM-DAD Dockets.Justia.com 1 2 REQUEST TO CONDITIONALLY SEAL DOCUMENTS PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that pursuant to Local Rule 141 and to the Stipulated Protective 3 Order and Confidentiality Agreement entered in this case [Docket No. 40], Plaintiffs seek court 4 approval to file their Opposition to Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss the First Amended Complaint, 5 the Declaration of Eric J. Buescher in Support thereof and its attached exhibit under seal. 6 1. 7 The parties’ Stipulated Protective Order provides: 1. The Parties shall have the right to designate as confidential any documents, things and information produced in compliance to a discovery request or other requirement of the rules of discovery which contains trade secrets, confidential research, development, commercial or financial information or any other proprietary or confidential business information. 8 9 10 11. All Confidential Documents and any papers containing information contained therein or derived therefrom that are filed with the Judge shall be filed in accordance with Local Rules 141 and 141.1(e). 11 12 13 14 [Docket No. 40]. 2. Defendants have designated the document attached as Exhibit 1 to the Declaration 15 of Eric J. Buescher as “CONFIDENTIAL.” Plaintiffs do not believe that the document is 16 properly designated as “CONFIDENTIAL” under the Protective Order, and reserve their right to 17 challenge that designation. However, Plaintiffs request that the Court allow the Opposition to 18 Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss the First Amended Complaint, the Declaration of Eric J. Buescher 19 in Support thereof and its attached exhibit to be filed under seal to avoid disclosing the 20 information designated as “CONFIDENTIAL” in Plaintiffs’ Opposition to Defendant’s Motion to 21 Dismiss the First Amended Complaint, the Declaration of Eric J. Buescher in Support thereof and 22 its attached exhibit. 23 3. The following portions of Plaintiffs’ Opposition to Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss 24 First Amended Complaint include or are derived from the exhibit Defendant has marked as 25 “CONFIDENTIAL;” 26 • Page 1, lines 8-9 (bolded text); 27 • Page 1, lines 12-13; 28 • Page 1, line 27; PLAINTIFFS’ REQUEST AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONDITIONALLY SEAL DOCUMENTS; Case No. 2:11-cv-02595-JAM-DAD 1 1 • Page 4, lines 23 to page 5, line 7; 2 • Page 5, lines 10-12 (bolded text); 3 • Page 5, lines 13-14; and 4 • Page 11, lines 13-15. 5 4. Under Local Rule 141, Plaintiffs hereby submit this Request to Conditionally Seal 6 Documents for a period of seven (7) days in order to provide time for Defendant to make a 7 showing that the document is properly designated as “CONFIDENTIAL” under the protective 8 order and to seek to have the document permanently placed under seal, a Proposed Order, along 9 with the Opposition to Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss the First Amended Complaint, the 10 Declaration of Eric J. Buescher in Support thereof and its attached exhibit for filing under seal. 5. 11 12 Conditionally Seal Documents. Defense counsel requested that the documents be filed under seal. 6. 13 14 15 Plaintiffs’ counsel conferred with defense counsel about filing this Request to Plaintiffs request that the documents be file-stamped as of today’s date, August 7, 2013. WHEREFORE, Plaintiffs respectfully request that this Court grant Plaintiffs’ Request to 16 Conditionally Seal the Opposition to Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss the First Amended 17 Complaint, the Declaration of Eric J. Buescher in Support thereof and its attached, and the relief 18 requested herein. 19 20 Respectfully Submitted, 21 Dated: August 7, 2013 22 23 24 COTCHETT, PITRE & McCARTHY, LLP By: /s/ Eric J. Buescher ERIC J. BUESCHER Attorneys for Plaintiffs and the Class 25 26 27 28 PLAINTIFFS’ REQUEST AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONDITIONALLY SEAL DOCUMENTS; Case No. 2:11-cv-02595-JAM-DAD 2 1 ORDER 2 Plaintiffs’ Request to Conditionally Seal their Opposition to Defendants’ Motion to 3 Dismiss, the Declaration of Eric J. Buescher in support of the same and the document attached as 4 Exhibit 1 to that declaration is GRANTED. 5 The documents shall be filed conditionally under seal for a period of seven (7) days. If 6 Defendant wishes to have the documents remain under seal, it shall provide to the Court the 7 reasons for doing so pursuant to the paragraph one of the parties stipulated protective order and 8 Local Rules 141 and 141.1 9 Plaintiffs’ Opposition to Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss, the Declaration of Eric J. 10 Buescher in support of the same and the document attached as Exhibit 1 to that declaration shall 11 be file-stamped with the date of August 7, 2013. 12 13 IT IS SO ORDERED. 14 15 16 17 Dated: 8/9/2013 /s/ John A. Mendez__________________ THE HONORABLE JOHN A. MENDEZ U. S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 PLAINTIFFS’ REQUEST AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONDITIONALLY SEAL DOCUMENTS; Case No. 2:11-cv-02595-JAM-DAD 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?