Gooden v. Suntrust Mortgage, Inc., et al.,
Filing
71
ORDER signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 8/9/2013 GRANTING 70 REQUEST to Conditionally Seal Documents. (Donati, J)
Gooden v. Suntrust Mortgage, Inc., et al.,
Doc. 71
6
NIALL P. McCARTHY (SBN 160175)
nmccarthy@cpmlegal.com
JUSTIN T. BERGER (SBN 250346)
jberger@cpmlegal.com
ERIC J. BUESCHER (SBN 271323)
ebuescher@cpmlegal.com
COTCHETT, PITRE & McCARTHY, LLP
840 Malcolm Road
Burlingame, California 94010
Telephone:
(650) 697-6000
Facsimile:
(650) 692-3606
7
Attorneys for Plaintiffs and the Class
1
2
3
4
5
8
9
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
10
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
11
12
SHEILA GOODEN, an individual; and
MICHELLE HALL, an individual,
Case No. 2:11-cv-02595-JAM-DAD
13
Plaintiffs,
14
vs.
PLAINTIFFS’ REQUEST AND ORDER
TO CONDITIONALLY SEAL
DOCUMENTS
15
16
17
SUNTRUST MORTGAGE, INC.,
a Virginia corporation,
Defendant.
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
PLAINTIFFS’ REQUEST AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONDITIONALLY SEAL
DOCUMENTS; Case No. 2:11-cv-02595-JAM-DAD
Dockets.Justia.com
1
2
REQUEST TO CONDITIONALLY SEAL DOCUMENTS
PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that pursuant to Local Rule 141 and to the Stipulated Protective
3
Order and Confidentiality Agreement entered in this case [Docket No. 40], Plaintiffs seek court
4
approval to file their Opposition to Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss the First Amended Complaint,
5
the Declaration of Eric J. Buescher in Support thereof and its attached exhibit under seal.
6
1.
7
The parties’ Stipulated Protective Order provides:
1.
The Parties shall have the right to designate as confidential any
documents, things and information produced in compliance to a discovery
request or other requirement of the rules of discovery which contains trade
secrets, confidential research, development, commercial or financial
information or any other proprietary or confidential business information.
8
9
10
11.
All Confidential Documents and any papers containing
information contained therein or derived therefrom that are filed with the
Judge shall be filed in accordance with Local Rules 141 and 141.1(e).
11
12
13
14
[Docket No. 40].
2.
Defendants have designated the document attached as Exhibit 1 to the Declaration
15
of Eric J. Buescher as “CONFIDENTIAL.” Plaintiffs do not believe that the document is
16
properly designated as “CONFIDENTIAL” under the Protective Order, and reserve their right to
17
challenge that designation. However, Plaintiffs request that the Court allow the Opposition to
18
Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss the First Amended Complaint, the Declaration of Eric J. Buescher
19
in Support thereof and its attached exhibit to be filed under seal to avoid disclosing the
20
information designated as “CONFIDENTIAL” in Plaintiffs’ Opposition to Defendant’s Motion to
21
Dismiss the First Amended Complaint, the Declaration of Eric J. Buescher in Support thereof and
22
its attached exhibit.
23
3.
The following portions of Plaintiffs’ Opposition to Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss
24
First Amended Complaint include or are derived from the exhibit Defendant has marked as
25
“CONFIDENTIAL;”
26
•
Page 1, lines 8-9 (bolded text);
27
•
Page 1, lines 12-13;
28
•
Page 1, line 27;
PLAINTIFFS’ REQUEST AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONDITIONALLY SEAL
DOCUMENTS; Case No. 2:11-cv-02595-JAM-DAD
1
1
•
Page 4, lines 23 to page 5, line 7;
2
•
Page 5, lines 10-12 (bolded text);
3
•
Page 5, lines 13-14; and
4
•
Page 11, lines 13-15.
5
4.
Under Local Rule 141, Plaintiffs hereby submit this Request to Conditionally Seal
6
Documents for a period of seven (7) days in order to provide time for Defendant to make a
7
showing that the document is properly designated as “CONFIDENTIAL” under the protective
8
order and to seek to have the document permanently placed under seal, a Proposed Order, along
9
with the Opposition to Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss the First Amended Complaint, the
10
Declaration of Eric J. Buescher in Support thereof and its attached exhibit for filing under seal.
5.
11
12
Conditionally Seal Documents. Defense counsel requested that the documents be filed under seal.
6.
13
14
15
Plaintiffs’ counsel conferred with defense counsel about filing this Request to
Plaintiffs request that the documents be file-stamped as of today’s date, August 7,
2013.
WHEREFORE, Plaintiffs respectfully request that this Court grant Plaintiffs’ Request to
16
Conditionally Seal the Opposition to Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss the First Amended
17
Complaint, the Declaration of Eric J. Buescher in Support thereof and its attached, and the relief
18
requested herein.
19
20
Respectfully Submitted,
21
Dated: August 7, 2013
22
23
24
COTCHETT, PITRE & McCARTHY, LLP
By:
/s/ Eric J. Buescher
ERIC J. BUESCHER
Attorneys for Plaintiffs and the Class
25
26
27
28
PLAINTIFFS’ REQUEST AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONDITIONALLY SEAL
DOCUMENTS; Case No. 2:11-cv-02595-JAM-DAD
2
1
ORDER
2
Plaintiffs’ Request to Conditionally Seal their Opposition to Defendants’ Motion to
3
Dismiss, the Declaration of Eric J. Buescher in support of the same and the document attached as
4
Exhibit 1 to that declaration is GRANTED.
5
The documents shall be filed conditionally under seal for a period of seven (7) days. If
6
Defendant wishes to have the documents remain under seal, it shall provide to the Court the
7
reasons for doing so pursuant to the paragraph one of the parties stipulated protective order and
8
Local Rules 141 and 141.1
9
Plaintiffs’ Opposition to Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss, the Declaration of Eric J.
10
Buescher in support of the same and the document attached as Exhibit 1 to that declaration shall
11
be file-stamped with the date of August 7, 2013.
12
13
IT IS SO ORDERED.
14
15
16
17
Dated: 8/9/2013
/s/ John A. Mendez__________________
THE HONORABLE JOHN A. MENDEZ
U. S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
PLAINTIFFS’ REQUEST AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONDITIONALLY SEAL
DOCUMENTS; Case No. 2:11-cv-02595-JAM-DAD
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?