Conservation Congress v. United States Forest Service et al

Filing 39

STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Judge Lawrence K. Karlton on 3/15/12: Plaintiff shall file a Supplemental Complaint by March 22, 2012 if no objections from defendants. (Kaminski, H)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IGNACIA S. MORENO, Assistant Attorney General SETH M. BARSKY, Chief S. JAY GOVINDAN, Assistant Chief ROBERT P. WILLIAMS, Trial Attorney (DC Bar No. 474730) MARY HOLLINGSWORTH, Trial Attorney (AZ Bar No. 027080) U.S. Department of Justice Environment & Natural Resources Division Wildlife & Marine Resources Section Ben Franklin Station, P.O. Box 7369 Washington, D.C. 20044-7369 (202) 305-0206 (tel) (202) 305-0275 (fax) 9 10 Attorneys for Federal Defendants 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE 12 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 13 Sacramento Division 14 15 16 17 CONSERVATION CONGRESS, CASE NO. 2:11-cv-02605-LKK -EFB Plaintiff, 18 v. 19 STIPULATED SCHEDULING ORDER FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION BRIEFING UNITED STATES FOREST SERVICE, and UNITED STATES FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE, 20 21 Defendants. 22 23 As directed by the Court during the March 12, 2012 status conference, the parties 24 respectfully submit this stipulated proposed scheduling order setting forth a proposed briefing 25 schedule for Plaintiff’s motion for a preliminary injunction. Federal Defendants and Defendant 26 Intervenor (collectively, “Defendants”), currently anticipate that Project activities will 27 28 1 2 commence on June 1, 2012 in certain high priority units that must be completed no later than September 30, 2012. Therefore, the parties propose the following briefing schedule: 3 March 19: Defendants shall advise Plaintiff whether or not they will oppose filing of the supplemental complaint March 22: If Defendants do not oppose the filing of the supplemental complaint, Plaintiff shall file its supplemental complaint April 5: Defendants shall file any responses to the supplemental complaint April 9: Plaintiff shall file its motion for preliminary injunction April 30: Defendants shall file their oppositions to Plaintiff’s motion for preliminary injunction May 7: 5 Plaintiff shall provide Defendants with a draft supplemental complaint March 21: 4 Plaintiff shall file its reply brief. 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 Hearing on Plaintiff’s motion for preliminary injunction is set for May 21, 2012 at 10:00 a.m. 15 In the event that Defendants oppose the filing of Plaintiff’s supplemental complaint, the 16 parties shall meet and confer and submit a proposed amended briefing schedule for the Court’s 17 consideration. 18 Dated this 14th day of March, 2012. 19 20 Respectfully Submitted, 21 IGNACIA S. MORENO, Assistant Attorney General SETH M. BARSKY, Chief KRISTEN L. GUSTAFSON, Assistant Chief 22 23 24 /s/ Robert P. Williams ROBERT P. WILLIAMS Trial Attorney MARY HOLLINGSWORTH 25 26 27 28 CONSERV. CONG. ET AL. V. USFS ET AL. (PROPOSED STIPULATED SCHEDULING ORDER) 2 11CV02605 1 Trial Attorney U.S. Department of Justice Environment & Natural Resources Division Wildlife & Marine Resources Section Ben Franklin Station P.O. Box 7369 Washington, DC 20044-7369 Phone: (202) 305-0206 Fax: (202) 305-0275 Email: Robert.P.williams@usdoj.gov 2 3 4 5 6 7 Attorneys for Federal Defendants 8 9 12 /s/ James J. Tutchton James J. Tutchton (CA Bar No. 150908) Tutchton Law Office, LLC 6439 E. Maplewood Ave. Centennial, CO 80111 Telephone: (720) 301-3843 Email: jtutchtontlo@gmail.com 13 Attorney for Plaintiff 10 11 14 /s/ Julie A. Weis Julie A. Weis Pro Hac Vice email: jweis@hk-law.com 15 16 HAGLUND KELLEY JONES & WILDER LLP 17 200 SW Market Street, Suite 1777 Portland, Oregon 97201 Phone: (503) 225-0777 Facsimile: (503) 225-1257 18 19 Attorneys for Defendant-Intervenor 20 21 22 23 PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED Dated: March 15, 2012 24 25 26 27 28 CONSERV. CONG. ET AL. V. USFS ET AL. (PROPOSED STIPULATED SCHEDULING ORDER) 3 11CV02605

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?