Martinez v. Watt Elkhorn Associates, LP et al

Filing 27

STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Judge Morrison C. England, Jr on 2/27/2012 ORDERING that Defendant Big 5 Corp is DISMISSED with prejudice as to the coumplaint of plaintiff. The case will remain open as to the other defendants. (Donati, J)

1

4

LYNN HUBBARD III, SBN 69773
SCOTTLYNN J HUBBARD IV, SBN 212970
DISABLED ADVOCACY GROUP, APLC
12 Williamsburg Lane
Chico, CA 95926
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]

5

Attorneys for Plaintiff

6

G. MICHAEL BROWN, SBN 085997
CANDICE S. TONG, SBN 269616
MUSICK, PEELER & GARRETT LLP
650 Town Center Drive, Suite 1200
Costa Mesa, CA 92626
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]

2
3

7
8
9
10
11

Attorneys for Defendant/Cross-Complainant
BIG 5 CORP.

12
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

13

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

14
15

TONY MARTINEZ,

16

Case No. 2:11-cv-02608-MCE-EFB

Plaintiff,
JOINT STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL
OF DEFENDANT BIG 5 CORP. and
ORDER THEREON

17

v.

18

WATT-ELKHORN ASSOCIATES, LP, et
al.,

19
20
21

Defendants.
AND RELATED CROSS-ACTION.
__________________________________/

22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Joint Stipulation for Dismissal of Defendant Big 5
Corp. and Order Thereon

-1-

Martinez v. Watt-Elkhorn Associates, LP, et al.
Case No. 2:11-cv-02608-MCE-EFB

1

TO THE COURT AND TO ALL PARTIES:

2

Plaintiff, TONY MARTINEZ, and defendant, BIG 5 CORP. dba BIG 5 SPORTING

3

GOODS #224, stipulate to and jointly request that this Court enter a dismissal with prejudice

4

of plaintiff’s complaint in the above-entitled action pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(2) as

5

to BIG 5 CORP. dba BIG 5 SPORTING GOODS #224 only.

6

Nothing in this dismissal shall be construed to affect plaintiff’s complaint and claims

7

against defendants other than defendant BIG 5 CORP. dba BIG 5 SPORTING GOODS

8

#224.

9
10

Dated: February 22, 2012

DISABLED ADVOCACY GROUP, APLC

11
12

/s/ Lynn Hubbard
LYNN HUBBARD III
Attorney for Plaintiff Tony Martinez

13
14
15

Dated: February 22, 2012

MUSICK, PEELER & GARRETT LLP

16
/s/ Candice S. Tong
CANDICE S. TONG
Attorney for Defendant Big 5 Corp.

17
18
19
20
21
22

ORDER
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the complaint of plaintiff, USDC Case No. 2:11-cv02608-MCE-EFB, is hereby dismissed with prejudice as to defendant BIG 5 CORP. dba BIG
5 SPORTING GOODS #224. The case will remain open as to the other defendants.

23
24

Dated: February 27, 2012
________________________________
MORRISON C. ENGLAND, JR.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

25
26
27
28
Joint Stipulation for Dismissal of Defendant Big 5
Corp. and Order Thereon

-2-

Martinez v. Watt-Elkhorn Associates, LP, et al.
Case No. 2:11-cv-02608-MCE-EFB