Martinez v. Watt Elkhorn Associates, LP et al
Filing
31
ORDER signed by Judge Morrison C. England, Jr on 3/8/12 ORDERING that BIG 5 CORP.'s Cross-Claim is dismissed without prejudice. (Becknal, R)
MUSICK, PEELER & GARRETT LLP
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
650 TOWN CENTER DRIVE, SUITE 1200
COSTA MESA, CALIFORNIA 92626-1925
TELEPHONE: 714-668-2422
FACSIMILE 714-668-2490
G. Michael Brown (State Bar No. 085997)
m.brown@mpglaw.com
Dennis C. Kong (State Bar No. 236737)
d.kong@mpglaw.com
Candice S. Tong (State Bar No. 269616)
c.tong@mpglaw.com
Attorneys for Defendant/Cross-Complainant, BIG 5 CORP.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
TONY MARTINEZ,
CASE No. 2:11-CV-02608-MCE-EFB
Plaintiff,
vs.
WATT-ELKHORN ASSOCIATES,
LP; BIG 5 CORP. dba BIG 5 Sporting
Goods #224; PNS Stores, Inc. dba Big
Lots,
Defendants.
ORDER RE: JOINT STIPULATION
FOR DISMISSAL OF CROSSCLAIM
Action Filed:
Trial Date:
October 4, 2011
BIG 5 CORP.,
Cross-Complainant.
vs.
WATT-ELKHORN Center, a general
partnership, aka WATT-ELKHORN
ASSOCIATES, L.P., a California
limited partnership, and ROES 1
through 50, Inclusive,
Cross-Defendants.
781001.1
2:11-CV-02608-MCE-EFB
[PROPOSED] ORDER RE: JOINT STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL OF CROSS-CLAIM
Upon consideration of the Joint Stipulation for Dismissal of Cross-Claim
submitted by Cross-Claimant, BIG 5 CORP., and Cross-Defendant, WATTELKHORN Center, a general partnership, aka WATT-ELKHORN ASSOCIATES,
L.P., a California limited partnership, dated October 28, 2011,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that BIG 5 CORP.’s Cross-Claim in the aboveentitled action is dismissed without prejudice
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: March 8, 2012
__________________________________
MORRISON C. ENGLAND, JR
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
DEAC_Signature-END:
c4d6b0d3
781001.1
2:11-CV-02608-MCE-EFB
[PROPOSED] ORDER RE: JOINT STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL OF CROSS-CLAIM
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?