Martinez v. Watt Elkhorn Associates, LP et al

Filing 31

ORDER signed by Judge Morrison C. England, Jr on 3/8/12 ORDERING that BIG 5 CORP.'s Cross-Claim is dismissed without prejudice. (Becknal, R)

Download PDF
MUSICK, PEELER & GARRETT LLP ATTORNEYS AT LAW 650 TOWN CENTER DRIVE, SUITE 1200 COSTA MESA, CALIFORNIA 92626-1925 TELEPHONE: 714-668-2422 FACSIMILE 714-668-2490 G. Michael Brown (State Bar No. 085997) m.brown@mpglaw.com Dennis C. Kong (State Bar No. 236737) d.kong@mpglaw.com Candice S. Tong (State Bar No. 269616) c.tong@mpglaw.com Attorneys for Defendant/Cross-Complainant, BIG 5 CORP. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA TONY MARTINEZ, CASE No. 2:11-CV-02608-MCE-EFB Plaintiff, vs. WATT-ELKHORN ASSOCIATES, LP; BIG 5 CORP. dba BIG 5 Sporting Goods #224; PNS Stores, Inc. dba Big Lots, Defendants. ORDER RE: JOINT STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL OF CROSSCLAIM Action Filed: Trial Date: October 4, 2011 BIG 5 CORP., Cross-Complainant. vs. WATT-ELKHORN Center, a general partnership, aka WATT-ELKHORN ASSOCIATES, L.P., a California limited partnership, and ROES 1 through 50, Inclusive, Cross-Defendants. 781001.1 2:11-CV-02608-MCE-EFB [PROPOSED] ORDER RE: JOINT STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL OF CROSS-CLAIM Upon consideration of the Joint Stipulation for Dismissal of Cross-Claim submitted by Cross-Claimant, BIG 5 CORP., and Cross-Defendant, WATTELKHORN Center, a general partnership, aka WATT-ELKHORN ASSOCIATES, L.P., a California limited partnership, dated October 28, 2011, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that BIG 5 CORP.’s Cross-Claim in the aboveentitled action is dismissed without prejudice IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: March 8, 2012 __________________________________ MORRISON C. ENGLAND, JR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE DEAC_Signature-END: c4d6b0d3 781001.1 2:11-CV-02608-MCE-EFB [PROPOSED] ORDER RE: JOINT STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL OF CROSS-CLAIM

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?