Akbar-Jones v. McDonald et al

Filing 10

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 8/28/12 ORDERING that Plaintiff file a response to the Court's 5/29/12 order within 21 days. If Plaintiff fails to comply with this order, the court will recommend that this action be dismissed pursuant to Rule 41(b) of the FRCP.(Mena-Sanchez, L)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 HAKIM AKBAR-JONES, 11 Plaintiff, 12 13 No. 2:11-cv-2627 CKD P vs. M. MCDONALD, et al., 14 Defendants. 15 ORDER / 16 On October 5, 2011, defendants removed this action to this court from the 17 Superior Court of Lassen County. Plaintiff filed an opposition to removal on October 24, 2011. 18 On May 29, 2012, the court ordered plaintiff to inform the court whether he wishes to pursue 19 claims under both federal and state law as it is not clear from plaintiff’s opposition to removal 20 that he wants to pursue claims under federal law.1 The time for responding to the court’s May 21 29, 2012 order has run out and plaintiff has not responded. Good cause appearing, IT IS 22 HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff file a response to the court’s May 29, 2012 order within 21 23 \\\\\ 24 25 26 1 If plaintiff wishes to pursue claims under federal law, the court will screen plaintiff’s complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(a). If plaintiff does not wish to pursue claims under federal law, the court will recommend that this action be remanded or dismissed, at which point plaintiff would be free to pursue his state law claims in the Superior Court of Lassen County. 1 days. If plaintiff fails to comply with this order, the court will recommend that this action be 2 dismissed pursuant to Rule 41(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. 3 Dated: August 28, 2012 4 _____________________________________ CAROLYN K. DELANEY UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 1 akba2627.rem(2)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?