Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation v. Varrasso et al

Filing 60

STIPULATION and ORDER to Modify Scheduling Order 58 signed by Judge William B. Shubb on 8/31/2012: The parties stipulate to the dates of September 28, 2012 for the initial disclosure and October 26, 2012 for the rebuttal disclosure. They further stipulate to extend the discovery deadline to November 30, 2012. No other provision of the Pretrial Scheduling Order is to be modified. PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. (Kirksey Smith, K)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 SUSAN D. CONDON (State Bar No. 143417) scondon@gcalaw.com VALERIE M. WAGNER (State Bar No. 173146) vwagner@gcalaw.com GCA LAW PARTNERS LLP 1891 Landings Dr. Mountain View, CA 94043 Telephone: (650) 428-3900 Facsimile: (650) 428-3901 Attorneys for FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION as Receiver for INDYMAC BANK, F.S.B. 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 10 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 SACRAMENTO 12 13 14 FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION as Receiver for INDYMAC BANK, F.S.B., Plaintiff, 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 vs. RICHARD K. VARRASSO dba Richard Varrasso and Associates and AppraisalTrust.com, an individual; PREMIER VALLEY, INC. dba CENTURY 21 M&M ASSOCIATES, a California corporation; and KAREN BHATTI, an individual, Case No. CIV. 2:11-2628 WBS CKD STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER TO MODIFY SCHEDULING ORDER Honorable William B. Shubb Trial: April 16, 2013 Defendants. 22 23 24 25 STIPULATION The parties, Plaintiff Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation as Receiver 26 for IndyMac Bank, F.S.B. and Defendants Richard Varrasso, Premier Valley Inc. 27 dba Century 21 M&M Associates, and Karen Bhatti by and through their counsel 28 of record or personally hereby stipulate and agree to modify the Pretrial GCA Law Partners LLP 1891 Landings Drive Mountain View, CA 94043 (650)428-3900 Stipulation to Extend Discovery Deadlines Case No. CIV. 2:11-2628 WBS CKD 1 1 Scheduling Order in this matter to extend the expert disclosure and discovery 2 cutoff dates. The Parties agree to extend the deadline for the disclosure of expert 3 witnesses and rebuttal witness by thirty days in order to accommodate the 4 calendar of Plaintiff’s expert. In light of the fact that the new disclosure deadline 5 would coincide with the close of discovery, the parties also seek a thirty day 6 extension in which to complete discovery. 7 The current due dates for disclosure of initial experts and rebuttal experts 8 are August 31, 2012 and September 28, 2012, respectively. The deadline for 9 completion of discovery is currently October 26, 2012. The parties stipulate to 10 the dates of September 28, 2012 for the initial disclosure and October 26, 2012 11 for the rebuttal disclosure. They further stipulate to extend the discovery 12 13 14 deadline to November 30, 2012. No other provision of the Pretrial Scheduling Order is to be modified. IT IS SO STIPULATED. 15 16 DATED: August 30, 2012 GCA LAW PARTNERS LLP 17 By:___/s/ Susan Condon__________ SUSAN CONDON Attorney for Plaintiff FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION as RECEIVER for INDYMAC BANK, F.S.B. 18 19 20 21 22 23 DATED: August 30, 2012 24 By:___/s/ Cory B. Chartrand_____ CORY B. CHARTRAND Attorneys for Defendants, PREMIER VALLEY, INC., DBA CENTURY 21 M&M AND ASSOCIATES, and KAREN BHATTI (as Authorized on August 30, 2012) 25 26 27 28 GCA Law Partners LLP 1891 Landings Drive Mountain View, CA 94043 (650)428-3900 TRIEBSCH & FRAMPTON Stipulation to Extend Discovery Deadlines Case No. CIV. 2:11-2628 WBS CKD 2 1 DATED: August 30, 2012 Richard Varrasso 2 By:___/s/ Richard Varrasso_____ Appearing Pro Se 3 4 (as Authorized on August 30, 2012) 5 6 7 8 9 PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED: August 31, 2012 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 GCA Law Partners LLP 1891 Landings Drive Mountain View, CA 94043 (650)428-3900 Stipulation to Extend Discovery Deadlines Case No. CIV. 2:11-2628 WBS CKD 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?