Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation v. Varrasso et al

Filing 88

STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Senior Judge William B. Shubb on 1/30/22013 ORDERING 87 Last day to move to amend pleadings due by 7/31/2013; Last day to move to join additional parties 7/31/2013; Designation of Expert Witnesses due by 8/13/2013 ; Rebuttal Expert Report 9/10/2013; Discovery due by 10/29/2013; Dispositive Motions filed by 12/2/2013; Final Pretrial Conference set for 1/21/2014 at 02:00 PM in Courtroom 5 (WBS) before Senior Judge William B. Shubb; Jury Trial set for 3/25/2014 at 09:00 AM in Courtroom 5 (WBS) before Senior Judge William B. Shubb. (Reader, L)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SACRAMENTO 11 12 13 FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION as Receiver for INDYMAC BANK, F.S.B., 14 Plaintiff, Case No. CIV. 2:11-2628 WBS CKD STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER TO MODIFY SCHEDULING ORDER; ORDER [PROPOSED] 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 vs. RICHARD K. VARRASSO dba Richard Varrasso and Associates and AppraisalTrust.com, an individual; PREMIER VALLEY, INC. dba CENTURY 21 M&M ASSOCIATES, a California corporation; and KAREN BHATTI, an individual, Honorable William B. Shubb Trial: April 16, 2013 Defendants. 22 23 24 STIPULATION The parties, by and through their counsel of record, hereby stipulate 25 and seek an order modifying this Court’s Pretrial Scheduling Order in light 26 of the following circumstances: (1) this Court’s Order granting Defendants’ 27 28 Motion for Leave to File a Third Party Complaint and providing until March 3, 2013 to serve the third party defendants (Document 68); (2) the Stipulation to Modify Scheduling Order; Order [Proposed] Case No. CIV. 2:11-2628 WBS CKD 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 delay in the issuance of the summonses with the filing of the Third Party Complaint of Defendant Premier Valley, Inc.; (3) the recent appearance of Third Party Defendants Josie Rich, Sophie Reisiyannejad and Emmanuel Kim; and (4) the anticipated appearances of additional third party defendants served with this action. At present, the final pretrial conference is scheduled for February 19, 2013 and trial is scheduled to commence on April 16, 2013. The parties have agreed that additional time is necessary to conduct 10 discovery before trial. The parties therefore seek trial and related deadlines 11 scheduled based upon a 10 month trial continuance to February 10, 2014. 12 Such a continuance would allow for adequate time for the newly added 13 parties to receive, review and analyze the parties’ initial and supplemental 14 Rule 26 disclosures, all previous discovery requests and responses, all 15 previously produced documents, and all deposition transcripts, evaluate the 16 facts and law for purposes of trial and settlement, add any necessary 17 additional parties, conduct necessary discovery, including written discovery 18 and percipient witness depositions, retain and depose experts, file any 19 dispositive motions, and prepare for trial. 20 21 Therefore, the parties hereby stipulate and respectfully request that the Court modify its current Scheduling Order as proposed below. 22 23 24 Event 25 Discovery & Pleading Proposed Date 26 Initial Rule 26 (a) Disclosures by Within 30 days of receipt of 27 New Parties and Production of Prior Supplemental Rule 26 (d) and (e) 28 Discovery Disclosure by Third Party Plaintiff and Stipulation to Modify Scheduling Order; Order [Proposed] Case No. CIV. 2:11-2628 WBS CKD 2 1 all prior discovery, including deposition 2 transcripts 3 Meet & Confer re Discovery Plan Within 14 days after Initial Rule 26 (a) 4 Disclosures by New Parties and 5 Production of Prior Discovery 6 Last Day to move to Amend July 31, 2013 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 Pleadings Last Day to move to Join Additional Parties Expert Disclosures & Discovery Opening Expert Reports August 13, 2013 Rebuttal Expert Reports September 10, 2013 Expert Discovery Cut-Off October 29, 2013 Dispositive Motions 15 16 17 July 31, 2013 Last Day for Hearing on Dispositive December 2, 2013 Motions, if any Trial 18 19 Final Pretrial Conference January 21, 2014 at 2:00 p.m. 20 Jury Trial March 25, 2014 at 9:00 a.m. 21 22 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: The Court adopts the trial date and related 23 deadlines as set forth above and modifies its Scheduling Order in accordance 24 therewith. 25 26 27 28 Stipulation to Modify Scheduling Order; Order [Proposed] Case No. CIV. 2:11-2628 WBS CKD 3 1 IT IS SO STIPULATED. 2 3 DATED: January 28, 2013 4 GCA LAW PARTNERS LLP By: __/s/ Susan Condon________ SUSAN CONDON Attorney for Plaintiff FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION as RECEIVER for INDYMAC BANK, F.S.B. (as Authorized on January 28, 2013) 5 6 7 8 9 10 DATED: January 28, 2013 11 TRIEBSCH & FRAMPTON By: __/s/ Cory B. Chartrand_____ CORY B. CHARTRAND Attorneys for Defendants PREMIER VALLEY, INC., DBA CENTURY 21 M&M AND ASSOCIATES, and KAREN BHATTI (as Authorized on January 28, 2013) 12 13 14 15 16 17 DATED: January 28, 2013 18 Richard Varrasso 19 By: __/s/ Richard Varrasso______ Appearing Pro Se 20 (as Authorized on January 28, 2013) 21 22 23 DATED: January 30, 2013 Emmanuel Kim 24 By: __/s/ Emmanuel Kim_______ Appearing Pro Se 25 (as Authorized on January 30, 2013) 26 27 28 Stipulation to Modify Scheduling Order; Order [Proposed] Case No. CIV. 2:11-2628 WBS CKD 4 1 2 DATED: January 28, 2013 LAW OFFICES OF S. MIYAKE 3 By: __/s/ Steven S. Miyake______ Steven S. Miyake Attorneys for Defendant JOSIE RICH (as Authorized on January 28, 2013) 4 5 6 7 8 9 DATED: January 28, 2013 WEYAND LAW FIRM, A Professional Corporation 10 By: __/s/ Alexander M. Weyand__ Alexander M. Weyand Attorneys for Defendant SOPHIE REISIYANNEJAD (as Authorized on January 28, 2013) 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED: January 30, 2013 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Stipulation to Modify Scheduling Order; Order [Proposed] Case No. CIV. 2:11-2628 WBS CKD 5

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?