Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation v. Varrasso et al
Filing
88
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Senior Judge William B. Shubb on 1/30/22013 ORDERING 87 Last day to move to amend pleadings due by 7/31/2013; Last day to move to join additional parties 7/31/2013; Designation of Expert Witnesses due by 8/13/2013 ; Rebuttal Expert Report 9/10/2013; Discovery due by 10/29/2013; Dispositive Motions filed by 12/2/2013; Final Pretrial Conference set for 1/21/2014 at 02:00 PM in Courtroom 5 (WBS) before Senior Judge William B. Shubb; Jury Trial set for 3/25/2014 at 09:00 AM in Courtroom 5 (WBS) before Senior Judge William B. Shubb. (Reader, L)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
SACRAMENTO
11
12
13
FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE
CORPORATION as Receiver for
INDYMAC BANK, F.S.B.,
14
Plaintiff,
Case No. CIV. 2:11-2628 WBS CKD
STIPULATION AND PROPOSED
ORDER TO MODIFY
SCHEDULING ORDER; ORDER
[PROPOSED]
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
vs.
RICHARD K. VARRASSO dba
Richard Varrasso and Associates and
AppraisalTrust.com, an individual;
PREMIER VALLEY, INC. dba
CENTURY 21 M&M ASSOCIATES, a
California corporation; and KAREN
BHATTI, an individual,
Honorable William B. Shubb
Trial: April 16, 2013
Defendants.
22
23
24
STIPULATION
The parties, by and through their counsel of record, hereby stipulate
25
and seek an order modifying this Court’s Pretrial Scheduling Order in light
26
of the following circumstances: (1) this Court’s Order granting Defendants’
27
28
Motion for Leave to File a Third Party Complaint and providing until
March 3, 2013 to serve the third party defendants (Document 68); (2) the
Stipulation to Modify Scheduling Order; Order [Proposed]
Case No. CIV. 2:11-2628 WBS CKD
1
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
delay in the issuance of the summonses with the filing of the Third Party
Complaint of Defendant Premier Valley, Inc.; (3) the recent appearance of
Third Party Defendants Josie Rich, Sophie Reisiyannejad and Emmanuel
Kim; and (4) the anticipated appearances of additional third party
defendants served with this action. At present, the final pretrial conference
is scheduled for February 19, 2013 and trial is scheduled to commence on
April 16, 2013.
The parties have agreed that additional time is necessary to conduct
10
discovery before trial. The parties therefore seek trial and related deadlines
11
scheduled based upon a 10 month trial continuance to February 10, 2014.
12
Such a continuance would allow for adequate time for the newly added
13
parties to receive, review and analyze the parties’ initial and supplemental
14
Rule 26 disclosures, all previous discovery requests and responses, all
15
previously produced documents, and all deposition transcripts, evaluate the
16
facts and law for purposes of trial and settlement, add any necessary
17
additional parties, conduct necessary discovery, including written discovery
18
and percipient witness depositions, retain and depose experts, file any
19
dispositive motions, and prepare for trial.
20
21
Therefore, the parties hereby stipulate and respectfully request that
the Court modify its current Scheduling Order as proposed below.
22
23
24
Event
25
Discovery & Pleading
Proposed Date
26
Initial Rule 26 (a) Disclosures by
Within 30 days of receipt of
27
New Parties and Production of Prior
Supplemental Rule 26 (d) and (e)
28
Discovery
Disclosure by Third Party Plaintiff and
Stipulation to Modify Scheduling Order; Order [Proposed]
Case No. CIV. 2:11-2628 WBS CKD
2
1
all prior discovery, including deposition
2
transcripts
3
Meet & Confer re Discovery Plan
Within 14 days after Initial Rule 26 (a)
4
Disclosures by New Parties and
5
Production of Prior Discovery
6
Last Day to move to Amend
July 31, 2013
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
Pleadings
Last Day to move to Join Additional
Parties
Expert Disclosures & Discovery
Opening Expert Reports
August 13, 2013
Rebuttal Expert Reports
September 10, 2013
Expert Discovery Cut-Off
October 29, 2013
Dispositive Motions
15
16
17
July 31, 2013
Last Day for Hearing on Dispositive
December 2, 2013
Motions, if any
Trial
18
19
Final Pretrial Conference
January 21, 2014 at 2:00 p.m.
20
Jury Trial
March 25, 2014 at 9:00 a.m.
21
22
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: The Court adopts the trial date and related
23
deadlines as set forth above and modifies its Scheduling Order in accordance
24
therewith.
25
26
27
28
Stipulation to Modify Scheduling Order; Order [Proposed]
Case No. CIV. 2:11-2628 WBS CKD
3
1
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
2
3
DATED: January 28, 2013
4
GCA LAW PARTNERS LLP
By: __/s/ Susan Condon________
SUSAN CONDON
Attorney for Plaintiff FEDERAL
DEPOSIT INSURANCE
CORPORATION as RECEIVER for
INDYMAC BANK, F.S.B.
(as Authorized on January 28, 2013)
5
6
7
8
9
10
DATED: January 28, 2013
11
TRIEBSCH & FRAMPTON
By: __/s/ Cory B. Chartrand_____
CORY B. CHARTRAND
Attorneys for Defendants PREMIER
VALLEY, INC., DBA CENTURY
21 M&M AND ASSOCIATES, and
KAREN BHATTI
(as Authorized on January 28, 2013)
12
13
14
15
16
17
DATED: January 28, 2013
18
Richard Varrasso
19
By: __/s/ Richard Varrasso______
Appearing Pro Se
20
(as Authorized on January 28, 2013)
21
22
23
DATED: January 30, 2013
Emmanuel Kim
24
By: __/s/ Emmanuel Kim_______
Appearing Pro Se
25
(as Authorized on January 30, 2013)
26
27
28
Stipulation to Modify Scheduling Order; Order [Proposed]
Case No. CIV. 2:11-2628 WBS CKD
4
1
2
DATED: January 28, 2013
LAW OFFICES OF S. MIYAKE
3
By: __/s/ Steven S. Miyake______
Steven S. Miyake
Attorneys for Defendant
JOSIE RICH
(as Authorized on January 28, 2013)
4
5
6
7
8
9
DATED: January 28, 2013
WEYAND LAW FIRM, A
Professional Corporation
10
By: __/s/ Alexander M. Weyand__
Alexander M. Weyand
Attorneys for Defendant
SOPHIE REISIYANNEJAD
(as Authorized on January 28, 2013)
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.
DATED: January 30, 2013
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Stipulation to Modify Scheduling Order; Order [Proposed]
Case No. CIV. 2:11-2628 WBS CKD
5
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?