Johnson v. CA Auto Sales Inc. et al

Filing 11

ORDER signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr. on 02/15/12 ORDERING that plaintiff failed to respond to the 8 01/20/12 Order by the deadline with respect to defendant Ann G. Besotes. Therefore, defendant Ann G. Besotes is DISMISSED from this action without prejudice. (Benson, A.)

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

2

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

3
4

Scott N. Johnson,
Plaintiff,

5
v.

6

8

CA Auto Sales Inc., Individually
and d/b/a CA Auto Sales; Ann G.
Besotes,

9

Defendants.
________________________________

7

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

2:11-cv-02636-GEB-CKD
ORDER OF DISMISSAL

10
11

Plaintiff was required to respond to an Order filed January

12

20, 2012, by either filing proof that defendants were served with

13

process or a document showing good cause for Plaintiff’s failure to

14

serve the defendants within the 120-day period prescribed in Federal

15

Rule of Civil Procedure 4(m). (ECF No. 8.) This filing was due no later

16

than February 6, 2012.

17

that failure to make the required showing by the deadline would result

18

in the unserved defendant(s) being dismissed from this action.

Id.

The January 20, 2012 Order warned Plaintiff

19

Plaintiff failed to respond to the January 20, 2012 Order by

20

this deadline with respect to Defendant Ann G. Besotes. Therefore,

21

Defendant

22

prejudice.

G.

Besotes

is

dismissed

from

this

action

IT IS SO ORDERED.

23
24

Ann

Dated:

February 15, 2012

25
26
27

GARLAND E. BURRELL, JR.
United States District Judge

28
1

without