Johnson v. CA Auto Sales Inc. et al

Filing 8

ORDER signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr. on 1/19/12, ORDERING the Status Conference CONTINUED to 3/26/2012 at 09:00 AM in Courtroom 10 (GEB) before Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr.. A joint status report shall be filed no later than 14 days prior. To avoid dismissal of this case, on or before 2/6/12, plaintiff shall file proof of service for the defendants or a filing providing sufficient explanation why service was not completed within Rule 4(m)s prescribed service period. (Kastilahn, A)

Download PDF
1 2 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 3 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 4 5 Scott N. Johnson, Plaintiff, 6 v. 7 9 CA Auto Sales Inc., Individually and d/b/a CA Auto Sales; Ann G. Besotes, 10 Defendants. ________________________________ 8 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 2:11-cv-02636-GEB-CKD ORDER CONTINUING STATUS (PRETRIAL SCHEDULING) CONFERENCE; FED. R. CIV. P. 4(M) NOTICE 11 12 Plaintiff’s Status Report filed January 16, 2012, reveals this 13 case is not ready to be scheduled. Therefore, the Status (Pretrial 14 Scheduling) Conference scheduled for hearing on January 30, 2012, is 15 continued to March 26, 2012, at 9:00 a.m. A joint status report shall be 16 filed no later than fourteen (14) days prior. 17 Further, Plaintiff is notified under Rule 4(m) of the Federal 18 Rules of Civil Procedure that failure to serve any defendant with 19 process within the 120 day period prescribed in that Rule may result in 20 the unserved defendant being dismissed. To avoid dismissal, on or before 21 February 22 defendants or a filing providing sufficient explanation why service was 23 not completed within Rule 4(m)’s prescribed service period. 2012, Plaintiff shall file proof of service IT IS SO ORDERED. 24 25 6, Dated: January 19, 2012 26 27 28 GARLAND E. BURRELL, JR. United States District Judge 1 for the

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?