O'Keefe v. Cate
Filing
252
ORDER signed by District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 1/20/16 ORDERING that the FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS filed 10/1/15 234 are ADOPTED in full; and Plaintiff's MOTION for Preliminary Injunction 223 is DENIED without prejudice. (Mena-Sanchez, L)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
TIMOTHY O’KEEFE,
12
Plaintiff,
13
14
No. 2: 11-cv-2659 KJM KJN P
v.
ORDER
JERRY BROWN, et al.,
15
Defendants.
16
Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action
17
18
seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate
19
Judge as provided by 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.
On October 1, 2015, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations
20
21
herein which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any
22
objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Plaintiff
23
has filed objections to the findings and recommendations.
In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 304,
24
25
this court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the file, the
26
court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper
27
analysis.
28
/////
1
1
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
2
1. The findings and recommendations filed October 1, 2015, are adopted in full; and
3
2. Plaintiff’s motion for injunctive relief (ECF No. 223) is denied without prejudice.
4
DATED: January 20, 2016
5
6
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?