O'Keefe v. Cate

Filing 252

ORDER signed by District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 1/20/16 ORDERING that the FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS filed 10/1/15 234 are ADOPTED in full; and Plaintiff's MOTION for Preliminary Injunction 223 is DENIED without prejudice. (Mena-Sanchez, L)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 TIMOTHY O’KEEFE, 12 Plaintiff, 13 14 No. 2: 11-cv-2659 KJM KJN P v. ORDER JERRY BROWN, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action 17 18 seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate 19 Judge as provided by 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On October 1, 2015, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations 20 21 herein which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any 22 objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Plaintiff 23 has filed objections to the findings and recommendations. In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 304, 24 25 this court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the file, the 26 court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper 27 analysis. 28 ///// 1 1 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 2 1. The findings and recommendations filed October 1, 2015, are adopted in full; and 3 2. Plaintiff’s motion for injunctive relief (ECF No. 223) is denied without prejudice. 4 DATED: January 20, 2016 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?