O'Keefe v. Cate
Filing
80
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 5/3/13 ORDERING that plaintiffs third amended complaint is DISMISSED with 30 days leave to file a fourth amended complaint. (Dillon, M)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
TIMOTHY O’KEEFE,
11
Plaintiff,
12
13
14
15
No. 2: 11-cv-2659 KJM KJN P
vs.
JERRY BROWN, et al..,
Defendants.
ORDER
/
16
Plaintiff is a state prisoner, proceeding without counsel, with a civil rights action
17
pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On January 2, 2012, the undersigned granted defendants’ motion
18
to dismiss plaintiff’s second amended complaint with leave to file a third amended complaint.
19
Pending before the court is plaintiff’s third amended complaint. For the following reasons, the
20
third amended complaint is dismissed with leave to file a fourth amended complaint.
21
At the time plaintiff filed the third amended complaint, he was housed at the R. J.
22
Donovan Correctional Facility (“RJDCF”). Named as defendants in the third amended complaint
23
are Karen Higgins, the Chief Psychiatrist for the California Department of Corrections and
24
Rehabilitation (“CDCR”), RJDCF Warden Paramo, and RJDCF Psychologists Greenwald and
25
McCarthy. Plaintiff alleges that he has not received adequate mental health treatment for
26
exhibitionism, voyeurism and paraphilia. Plaintiff seeks injunctive relief only. In particular,
1
1
plaintiff requests that the court order defendants to provide him with adequate psychiatric
2
treatment for exhibitionism, voyeurism and paraphilia.
3
On April 10, 2013, plaintiff filed a notice of change of address. Plaintiff alleges
4
that he is temporarily housed at the California Medical Facility (“CMF”). Plaintiff alleges that he
5
was on his way to Mule Creek Street Prison (“MCSP”) when he was placed in a temporary crisis
6
bed at CMF. Plaintiff alleges that he will inform the court as soon as he receives permanent
7
placement.
8
When an inmate seeks injunctive relief concerning an institution at which he is no
9
longer incarcerated, his claims for such relief become moot. See Sample v. Borg, 870 F.2d 563
10
(9th Cir. 1989); Darring v. Kincheloe, 783 F.2d 874, 876 (9th Cir. 1986). See also Reimers v.
11
Oregon, 863 F.2d 630, 632 (9th Cir. 1988). Because plaintiff’s third amended complaint seeks
12
injunctive relief regarding conditions at RJDCF, where he is no longer housed, the third amended
13
complaint is dismissed with leave to amend.
14
Because plaintiff is not yet housed at the prison where he will be permanently
15
housed, the court understands that it may be difficult for plaintiff to prepare and file a fourth
16
amended complaint at this time. Moreover, once plaintiff arrives at the prison where he is to be
17
permanently housed, plaintiff may not immediately know whether he will receive the mental
18
health treatment he seeks. While plaintiff is granted thirty days to file a fourth amended
19
complaint, the court understands that he may require additional time if he has not been
20
transferred to the prison where he is to be permanently housed within that time. If plaintiff
21
remains at CMF in the crisis bed for an extended period of time, plaintiff may consider
22
dismissing this action without prejudice to its refiling once he receives permanent housing.
23
In dismissing plaintiff’s third amended complaint with leave to amend on grounds
24
of mootness, the undersigned refers to the January 2, 2013 order granting defendants’ motion to
25
dismiss. In this order, the undersigned found that plaintiff’s systemic claims concerning mental
26
health care must be brought through the Coleman class action. See Coleman v. Schwarzenegger,
2
1
No. 2: 90-cv-0520 LKK JFM (E.D. Cal.). The January 2, 2013 order also advised plaintiff to
2
name as defendants those persons responsible for the alleged denial of personal mental health
3
care. Accordingly, the fourth amended complaint shall name as defendants those persons at the
4
prison where plaintiff is permanently housed who are responsible for the alleged denial of
5
personal mental health care. Plaintiff is cautioned that the fourth amended complaint must make
6
clear the specific treatment, or lack of treatment, he alleges demonstrates deliberate indifference
7
to his serious mental health needs.
8
9
10
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff’s third amended complaint
is dismissed with thirty days leave to file a fourth amended complaint.
DATED: May 3, 2013
11
12
_____________________________________
KENDALL J. NEWMAN
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
13
14
ok2659.ame
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?