O'Keefe v. Cate
Filing
87
ORDER signed by Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 7/30/2013 ADOPTING, in full, 76 Findings and Recommendations; DENYING 75 Motion for Preliminary Injunction construed as a Motion for Temporary Restraining Order. (Michel, G)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
TIMOTHY O’KEEFE,
11
Plaintiff,
vs.
12
13
No. 2:11-cv-2659 KJM KJN P
JERRY BROWN, et al.,
Defendants.
14
ORDER
/
15
Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action
16
17
seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983.1 The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate
18
Judge as provided by 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.
On February 8, 2013, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations,
19
20
which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to
21
the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Plaintiff has filed
22
objections to the findings and recommendations.
23
/////
24
1
25
26
Given the nature of plaintiff’s claims, the court notes he may be a member of the
Coleman class. See Coleman v. Brown, Case No. CIV-S-90-0520 LKK JFM (E.D. Cal.). But
that does not necessarily bar him from seeking relief specific to his own mental health needs.
See Anderson v. Zika, 2013 WL 132546, at *2-3 (N.D. Cal. Jan. 9, 2013).
1
1
In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule
2
304, this court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the file,
3
the court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by the
4
proper analysis.
5
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
6
1. The findings and recommendations filed February 8, 2013, are adopted in full;
7
8
9
10
and
2. Plaintiff’s February 4, 2013 motion (dkt. no. 75), construed as a motion for
temporary restraining order, is denied without prejudice.
DATED: July 30, 2013.
11
12
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?