Holmes v. Miller

Filing 81

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 8/2/2016 DENYING Petitioner's 79 Motion to Conduct the Deposition of Hon. Steve White. (Jackson, T)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 JESSICA HOLMES, 12 13 14 15 No. 2:11-cv-2710 JKS KJN P (TEMP) Petitioner, ORDER v. DEBORAH K. JOHNSON, Warden, Respondent. 16 17 Petitioner is a state prisoner, proceeding through counsel, with a petition for a writ of 18 habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. An evidentiary hearing is scheduled in this matter 19 on August 22, 2016, on petitioner’s claim that her trial counsel rendered ineffective assistance 20 during the plea bargain process. 21 On July 29, 2016, petitioner filed a motion requesting permission to conduct the 22 deposition of Steve White, the state court judge who presided over petitioner’s trial. After a 23 review of the motion, the court does not find good cause to order the discovery sought by 24 petitioner. The motion reflects that Judge White informed petitioner’s current counsel that all of 25 his communications with petitioner were in “open court, in the presence of all counsel and on the 26 record.” ECF No. 79 at 3. Thus, whether or not petitioner was informed by the trial judge that 27 she faced a sentence of life without parole will appear on the state court record. The undersigned 28 expects the relevant record to be filed by the parties in connection with the evidentiary hearing. 1 1 2 The August 22, 2016 date set for that hearing is hereby confirmed. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that petitioner’s motion requesting permission to conduct 3 the deposition of Hon. Steve White (ECF No. 79) is denied. 4 Dated: August 2, 2016 5 6 7 KJN:holmes2710.o(3);dmou8(2) 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?