Flattum v. State of California Department of Consumer Affairs et al

Filing 14

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 1/26/12 ORDERING that Plaintiff's 1/18/12 MOTION for default judgment 12 is DENIED. The Clerk shall vacate entry of default entered on 1/9/12 10 . Plaintiff shall serve process on both defendants in accordance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 4 (j)(2) or Cal. Code Civ. Proc. § 416.50 within sixty (60) days of this order. Failure to properly service process will result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed.(Mena-Sanchez, L)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 GORDON H. FLATTUM, 11 12 13 Plaintiff, No. CIV S-11-2711 LKK GGH PS vs. STATE OF CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CONSUMER AFFAIRS, et al., 14 Defendants. 15 16 ORDER / On January 18, 2012, plaintiff filed a Motion for Default Judgment as to both 17 defendants, the “State of California Department of Consumer Affairs” and the California Board 18 of Accountancy. Fed. R. Civ. P. 55(a). Defendants did not file oppositions and have not 19 appeared in the action. 20 Plaintiff’s request will be denied. It cannot be said that any defendant has failed 21 to defend this action because none have been adequately served with process. Although plaintiff 22 attempted service of process by certified mail with return receipt upon the “Department of 23 Consumer Affairs California Board of Accountancy” and the Attorney General (dkt. no. 5), this 24 method did not conform with the requirements of Cal. Code Civ. Proc. § 416.50. Section 416.50 25 requires that service of process upon a public entity is completed by “delivering a copy of the 26 summons and complaint to the clerk, secretary, president, presiding officer, or other head of its 1 1 governing body.” “‘[P]ublic entity’ includes the state and any office, department, division, 2 bureau, board, commission, or agency of the state, the Regents of the University of California, a 3 county, city, district, public authority, public agency, and any other political subdivision or public 4 corporation in this state.” See generally Fed. R. Civ. P. 4. 5 Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that: 6 1. Plaintiff’s January 18, 2012 motion for default judgment (dkt. no. 12) is 7 premature and is denied. 8 9 10 2. The Clerk of the Court shall vacate entry of default entered January 9, 2012 (dkt. no. 10). 3. Plaintiff shall serve process on both defendants in accordance with Fed. R. Civ. 11 P. 4 (j)(2) or Cal. Code Civ. Proc. § 416.50 within sixty (60) days of this order. Failure to 12 properly service process will result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed. 13 DATED: January 26, 2012 14 /s/ Gregory G. Hollows UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 15 16 GGH:076 Flattum2711.def.wpd 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?