Flattum v. State of California Department of Consumer Affairs et al
Filing
14
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 1/26/12 ORDERING that Plaintiff's 1/18/12 MOTION for default judgment 12 is DENIED. The Clerk shall vacate entry of default entered on 1/9/12 10 . Plaintiff shall serve process on both defendants in accordance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 4 (j)(2) or Cal. Code Civ. Proc. § 416.50 within sixty (60) days of this order. Failure to properly service process will result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed.(Mena-Sanchez, L)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
GORDON H. FLATTUM,
11
12
13
Plaintiff,
No. CIV S-11-2711 LKK GGH PS
vs.
STATE OF CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT
OF CONSUMER AFFAIRS, et al.,
14
Defendants.
15
16
ORDER
/
On January 18, 2012, plaintiff filed a Motion for Default Judgment as to both
17
defendants, the “State of California Department of Consumer Affairs” and the California Board
18
of Accountancy. Fed. R. Civ. P. 55(a). Defendants did not file oppositions and have not
19
appeared in the action.
20
Plaintiff’s request will be denied. It cannot be said that any defendant has failed
21
to defend this action because none have been adequately served with process. Although plaintiff
22
attempted service of process by certified mail with return receipt upon the “Department of
23
Consumer Affairs California Board of Accountancy” and the Attorney General (dkt. no. 5), this
24
method did not conform with the requirements of Cal. Code Civ. Proc. § 416.50. Section 416.50
25
requires that service of process upon a public entity is completed by “delivering a copy of the
26
summons and complaint to the clerk, secretary, president, presiding officer, or other head of its
1
1
governing body.” “‘[P]ublic entity’ includes the state and any office, department, division,
2
bureau, board, commission, or agency of the state, the Regents of the University of California, a
3
county, city, district, public authority, public agency, and any other political subdivision or public
4
corporation in this state.” See generally Fed. R. Civ. P. 4.
5
Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that:
6
1. Plaintiff’s January 18, 2012 motion for default judgment (dkt. no. 12) is
7
premature and is denied.
8
9
10
2. The Clerk of the Court shall vacate entry of default entered January 9, 2012
(dkt. no. 10).
3. Plaintiff shall serve process on both defendants in accordance with Fed. R. Civ.
11
P. 4 (j)(2) or Cal. Code Civ. Proc. § 416.50 within sixty (60) days of this order. Failure to
12
properly service process will result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed.
13
DATED: January 26, 2012
14
/s/ Gregory G. Hollows
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
15
16
GGH:076
Flattum2711.def.wpd
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?