Flattum v. State of California Department of Consumer Affairs et al

Filing 25

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 4/8/13 GRANTING 24 Motion for Leave to File Second Amended Complaint. This action is no longer stayed. Defendants shall file a response to the second amended complaint within 28 days of this order. (Meuleman, A)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 GORDON H. FLATTUM, 10 11 Plaintiff, No. CIV S-11-2711 LKK GGH PS vs. 12 13 14 STATE OF CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CONSUMER AFFAIRS, et al., Defendants. 15 16 ORDER / Plaintiff is proceeding in this action pro se and in forma pauperis. This 17 proceeding was referred to this court by Local Rule 302(c)(21). On July 9, 2012, the district 18 court adopted this court findings and recommendations which recommended denying defendant’s 19 motion to dismiss without prejudice and staying this action until the administrative proceedings 20 in state court are concluded. Plaintiff has now filed a motion for leave to file a second amended 21 complaint which indicates that the administrative proceedings are concluded. Defendants have 22 not filed an opposition to the motion. 23 Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that: 24 1. This action is no longer stayed. 25 2. Plaintiff’s motion for leave to file a second amended complaint, filed February 26 25, 2013, (dkt. no. 24), is granted. 1 1 3. Defendants shall file a response to the second amended complaint within 2 twenty-eight (28) days of this order. 3 DATED: April 8, 2013 4 /s/ Gregory G. Hollows UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 GGH:076/Flattum2711.2am.wpd

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?