Ortega v. Unknown

Filing 4

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 10/24/2011 ORDERING that pltf's 2 application to proceed IFP is DISMISSED w/out prejudice; the clerk to send pltf a new ifp application; and pltf to submit, w/in 30 days, a completed application to proceed ifp. (Yin, K)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 LAZARUS D. ORTEGA, 11 Plaintiff, Defendant. 12 13 No. CIV S-11-2735 CKD P ORDER vs. UNKNOWN, 14 15 / 16 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed a civil rights action pursuant 17 to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 together with a request for leave to proceed in forma pauperis pursuant to 28 18 U.S.C. § 1915. Plaintiff has not, however, filed his application for leave to proceed in forma 19 pauperis on the form used by this district. Accordingly, plaintiff’s application will be dismissed 20 and plaintiff will be provided the opportunity to submit the application on the appropriate form. 21 Plaintiff is cautioned that he must also provide a certified copy of his prison trust account 22 statement for the six month period immediately preceding the filing of his complaint. 23 In accordance with the above, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 24 1. Plaintiff’s application to proceed in forma pauperis (Docket No. 2) is 25 dismissed without prejudice; 26 //// 1 1 2 2. The Clerk of the Court is directed to send plaintiff a new Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis By a Prisoner; and 3 3. Plaintiff shall submit, within thirty days from the date of this order, a 4 completed application to proceed in forma pauperis. Plaintiff’s failure to comply with this order 5 will result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed without prejudice. 6 Dated: October 24, 2011 7 _____________________________________ CAROLYN K. DELANEY UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 8 9 10 11 12 /kly orte2735.3d 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?