(PS) Chipman v. Nelson et al

Filing 615

STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 10/27/2021 MODIFYING the scheduling order as follows: Plaintiff's expert disclosure due by 02/01/2022; Defendants' expert disclosures due by 02/15/2022; and Rebuttal disclosures due by 03/04/2022. (Rodriguez, E)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 J. RANDALL ANDRADA (SBN 70000) randrada@andradalaw.com ANDRADA & ASSOCIATES PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION 1939 Harrison Street, Suite 612 Oakland, California 94612 Tel.: (510) 287-4160 Fax: (510) 287-4161 Attorneys for Defendant ENLOE MEDICAL CENTER 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SACRAMENTO DIVISION PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION ANDRADA & ASSOCIATES 11 12 13 Case No.: 2:11-cv-02770-TLN-EFB RICKIE L CHIPMAN, Plaintiff, 14 15 MARCIA F. NELSON, et al., Defendants. 16 17 18 19 20 21 pursuant to Local Rules 143 and 144, stipulate as follows: 1. The Court issued a Scheduling Order on October 20, 2021, namely Document 613. 2. The Order stated in part as follows: A) The plaintiff shall serve her expert disclosure on or before December 2, 2021; B) The defendants shall serve their expert disclosure on or before December 16, 2021; 23 C) Rebuttal disclosures shall be served on or before January 5, 2022. 24 26 27 28 Action Filed: October 20, 2011 The plaintiff, who is in pro per, and the defendants, who are represented by counsel, and 22 25 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND EXPERT DISCLOSURE AND EXPERT DEPOSITIONS v. D) Expert depositions “shall be completed within thirty days of disclosure.” 3. The Order further stated as follows: “The court recognizes that this schedule covers the end of the year holiday period. The court is amenable to granting reasonable extensions if necessary.” 1 {00122184.DOC/}OPTIMA 0983 STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND EXPERT DISCLOSURE & DEPOS Chipman v. Nelson, et al. 2:11-cv-02770-TLN-EFB 1 4. Good cause exists for the Court to extend the disclosure and discovery deadlines. The 2 good cause includes the fact, as stated by the court, that “this schedule covers the end of the year holiday 3 period.” 4 5. Further good cause exists because other professional demands upon the attorneys and 5 expert witnesses, and the requirement under the Federal Rules that written reports be provided by the 6 experts, make it difficult, if not impossible, to comply with the time limits imposed by the Court in its 7 order. 8 9 10 6. December 6-10, 2021 in Kass v. County of Alameda. The case is venued in the Northern District of the Federal Court, and is considered to be a date certain. There is no possibility of settlement in the case. PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION ANDRADA & ASSOCIATES 11 12 7. 8. I sent an email to the plaintiff and codefense counsel on October 21, 2021. It stated the following in pertinent part: 15 “The three of us should ask the court to extend the deadline of Ms. Chipman to February 1, 2022. The deadline for the defendants should be moved to February 15. The rebuttal disclosure deadline should be moved to March 4.” 16 17 18 Additionally, counsel for Dr. Joseph Matthews is scheduled to take a few days of vacation from October 28 through November 1, and November 12 through November 15, 2021. 13 14 The other professional demands upon counsel for Enloe Medical Center include trial on 9. The plaintiff responded by email on that same day. Her email stated in pertinent part: “. . . I hereby confirm and accept your proposal to request an extension, as you have stated with this proposal [of today] . . .” 19 20 21 22 10. email stated in pertinent part: “We agree with Mr. Andrada’s proposal and look forward to receipt of the joint stipulation for our execution.” 23 24 25 26 Counsel for co-defendant Dr. Joseph Matthews responded by email on October 22. His 11. Given all of the above, the parties request that the Court change the disclosure dates of December 2, December 16, and January 5 to the following: 27 a) Plaintiff’s expert disclosure shall be served on or before February 1, 2022; 28 b) Defendants’ expert disclosures shall be served on or before February 15, 2022; and 2 {00122184.DOC/}OPTIMA 0983 STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND EXPERT DISCLOSURE & DEPOS Chipman v. Nelson, et al. 2:11-cv-02770-TLN-EFB 1 c) 2 12. Rebuttal disclosures shall be served on or before March 4, 2022. Additionally, the Order dated October 20 requires the parties to complete “any expert 3 depositions . . . within thirty days of disclosure.” Given all of the above, the parties request that the 4 Court issue the following order with regard to the completion of expert depositions: 5 a) 6 If any party deposes one or more experts who were disclosed by the plaintiff on or before February 1, said deposition(s) must be completed on or before March 3, 2022. 7 b) If any party deposes one or more experts who were disclosed by one or more 8 defendants on or before February 15, 2022, said deposition(s) must be completed on 9 or before March 17, 2022. 10 c) PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION ANDRADA & ASSOCIATES 11 said deposition(s) must be completed on or before April 4, 2022. 12 13 If any party deposes one or more experts who were disclosed as a rebuttal expert, 13. The parties respectfully request that the Court extend the dates for expert disclosure and expert depositions as set forth above. 14 IT IS SO STIPULATED 15 16 Dated: October 22, 2021 ANDRADA & ASSOCIATES 17 By 18 19 document with their electronic signatures. /s/ J. Randall Andrada 22 J. RANDALL ANDRADA 23 24 J. RANDALL ANDRADA Attorneys for Defendant ENLOE MEDICAL CENTER I attest that Rickie L. Chipman and Steven M. McKinley have authorized me to file this 20 21 /s/ J. Randall Andrada Date: October 22, 2021 25 /s/ Rickie L. Chipman 26 RICKIE L. CHIPMAN Plaintiff 27 28 3 {00122184.DOC/}OPTIMA 0983 STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND EXPERT DISCLOSURE & DEPOS Chipman v. Nelson, et al. 2:11-cv-02770-TLN-EFB 1 Dated: October 22, 2021 LOW McKINLEY BALERIA & SALENKO, LLP 2 3 By 4 5 /s/ Steven M. McKinley STEVEN M. McKINLEY Attorneys for Defendant JOSEPH M. MATTHEWS 6 7 IT IS SO ORDERED. 8 9 Dated: October 27, 2021. 10 _____________________________ EDMUND F. BRENNAN UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION ANDRADA & ASSOCIATES 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 4 {00122184.DOC/}OPTIMA 0983 STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND EXPERT DISCLOSURE & DEPOS Chipman v. Nelson, et al. 2:11-cv-02770-TLN-EFB

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?