(PS) Chipman v. Nelson et al

Filing 75

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 4/3/12 DENYING AS MOOT #65 Motion for Extension of Time to Amend. (Meuleman, A)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10

RICKIE L. CHIPMAN,

11

Plaintiff,

12
13
14

No. CIV S-11-2770 GEB EFB PS

vs.
MARCIA F. NELSON, et al.,
Defendants.

ORDER
/

15
16

This case, in which plaintiff is proceeding pro se, is before the undersigned pursuant to

17

Eastern District of California Local Rule 302(c)(21). See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). On March 12,

18

2012, the court granted plaintiff until March 30, 2012 to file an amended complaint in this

19

action. Dckt. No.64. Then, on March 28, 2012, plaintiff filed a request for an extension of that

20

deadline. Dckt. No. 65. Many of the defendants named in plaintiff’s original complaint filed

21

oppositions to that request. Dckt. Nos. 66-73. However, on March 30, 2012, plaintiff filed her

22

first amended complaint. Dckt. No. 74. Accordingly, plaintiff’s request for an extension of time

23

to amend, Dckt. No. 65, is denied as moot.

24

DATED: April 3, 2012.

25
26