Fairfield-Suisun Unified School District
Filing
9
STIPULATION AND ORDER signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 3/6/12 ORDERING that the parties have agreed to jointly submit an Amended Rule 26(f) Joint Status Report within thirty (30) days of the date of the Court's ruling on Defendant's Motion to Dismiss, if appropriate. (Becknal, R)
1 Roy A. Combs, SBN 123507
rcombs@fagenfriedman.com
2 Jan E. Tomsky, SBN 173131
jtomsky@fagenfriedman.com
3 Emily E. Sugrue, SBN 243710
esugrue@fagenfriedman.com
4 FAGEN FRIEDMAN & FULFROST, LLP
70 Washington Street, Suite 205
5 Oakland, California 94607
Phone: 510-550-8200
6 Fax: 510-550-8211
7 Attorneys for Fairfield-Suisun Unified School
District
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
10
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SACRAMENTO DIVISION
11
70 Washington Street, Suite 205
Oakland, California 94607
Main: 510-550-8200 • Fax: 510-550-8211
Fagen Friedman & Fulfrost, LLP
9
12 FAIRFIELD SUISUN UNIFIED SCHOOL
DISTRICT,
13
Plaintiff,
14
vs.
15
STATE OF CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT
16 OF EDUCATION, and DOES 1-25, inclusive,
CASE NO. 2:11-CV-02796-JAM-GGH
JOINT STIPULATION AND ORDER TO
SUBMIT AMENDED RULE 26(f) JOINT
STATUS REPORT
Defendant.
17
18
SUBJECT TO THE APPROVAL OF THIS COURT, THE PARTIES HEREBY STIPULATE TO
19
THE FOLLOWING:
20
1.
On or about February 27, 2012, the parties, through their respective counsel of
21
record, engaged in the Rule 26 conference telephonically to discuss those items required by Rule
22
26(f) as well those matters specified in the court's Order Requiring Joint Status Report.
23
2.
As part of the conference outcome, and subject to the Court's approval, the parties
24
have agreed to jointly submit a Rule 26(f) Joint Status Report addressing those issues set forth in
25
Paragraph 4 of the Order Requiring Joint Status Report excepting that a detailed discussion and
26
agreement regarding the Rule 26(f) discovery plan, proposed date by which all non-discovery
27
motions shall be filed, proposed dates for final pretrial conference and trial as well as a
28
1
JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO SUBMIT AMENDED RULE 26(f) JOINT STATUS
REPORT
PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com
1 determination regarding the need to schedule a settlement conference for the above-referenced
2 matter would be deferred until after the Court's ruling on Defendant's Motion to Dismiss if
3 appropriate, and if appropriate shall be set forth in an Amended Rule 26(f) Joint Status Report.
4
3.
Consistent with the foregoing and subject to the Court's approval, the parties have
5 agreed to jointly submit the Amended Rule 26(f) Joint Status Report within thirty (30) days of the
6 date of the Court's ruling on Defendant's Motion to Dismiss, if appropriate.
7
SO STIPULATED.
8
9 DATED: March 5, 2012
FAGEN FRIEDMAN & FULFROST, LLP
10
70 Washington Street, Suite 205
Oakland, California 94607
Main: 510-550-8200 • Fax: 510-550-8211
Fagen Friedman & Fulfrost, LLP
11
By: /s/ Roy A. Combs
Roy A. Combs
Attorneys for Plaintiff
12
13
14
15 DATED: March 5, 2012
16
17
/s/ Len Garfinkel
Len Garfinkel
California Department of Education
Attorney for Defendant
18
ORDER
19
20 IT IS SO ORDERED.
DATED: 3/6/2012
21
22
/s/ John A. Mendez_______________________
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO SUBMIT AMENDED RULE 26(f) JOINT STATUS
REPORT
PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?