Fairfield-Suisun Unified School District

Filing 9

STIPULATION AND ORDER signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 3/6/12 ORDERING that the parties have agreed to jointly submit an Amended Rule 26(f) Joint Status Report within thirty (30) days of the date of the Court's ruling on Defendant's Motion to Dismiss, if appropriate. (Becknal, R)

Download PDF
1 Roy A. Combs, SBN 123507 rcombs@fagenfriedman.com 2 Jan E. Tomsky, SBN 173131 jtomsky@fagenfriedman.com 3 Emily E. Sugrue, SBN 243710 esugrue@fagenfriedman.com 4 FAGEN FRIEDMAN & FULFROST, LLP 70 Washington Street, Suite 205 5 Oakland, California 94607 Phone: 510-550-8200 6 Fax: 510-550-8211 7 Attorneys for Fairfield-Suisun Unified School District 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 10 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SACRAMENTO DIVISION 11 70 Washington Street, Suite 205 Oakland, California 94607 Main: 510-550-8200 • Fax: 510-550-8211 Fagen Friedman & Fulfrost, LLP 9 12 FAIRFIELD SUISUN UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT, 13 Plaintiff, 14 vs. 15 STATE OF CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT 16 OF EDUCATION, and DOES 1-25, inclusive, CASE NO. 2:11-CV-02796-JAM-GGH JOINT STIPULATION AND ORDER TO SUBMIT AMENDED RULE 26(f) JOINT STATUS REPORT Defendant. 17 18 SUBJECT TO THE APPROVAL OF THIS COURT, THE PARTIES HEREBY STIPULATE TO 19 THE FOLLOWING: 20 1. On or about February 27, 2012, the parties, through their respective counsel of 21 record, engaged in the Rule 26 conference telephonically to discuss those items required by Rule 22 26(f) as well those matters specified in the court's Order Requiring Joint Status Report. 23 2. As part of the conference outcome, and subject to the Court's approval, the parties 24 have agreed to jointly submit a Rule 26(f) Joint Status Report addressing those issues set forth in 25 Paragraph 4 of the Order Requiring Joint Status Report excepting that a detailed discussion and 26 agreement regarding the Rule 26(f) discovery plan, proposed date by which all non-discovery 27 motions shall be filed, proposed dates for final pretrial conference and trial as well as a 28 1 JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO SUBMIT AMENDED RULE 26(f) JOINT STATUS REPORT PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com 1 determination regarding the need to schedule a settlement conference for the above-referenced 2 matter would be deferred until after the Court's ruling on Defendant's Motion to Dismiss if 3 appropriate, and if appropriate shall be set forth in an Amended Rule 26(f) Joint Status Report. 4 3. Consistent with the foregoing and subject to the Court's approval, the parties have 5 agreed to jointly submit the Amended Rule 26(f) Joint Status Report within thirty (30) days of the 6 date of the Court's ruling on Defendant's Motion to Dismiss, if appropriate. 7 SO STIPULATED. 8 9 DATED: March 5, 2012 FAGEN FRIEDMAN & FULFROST, LLP 10 70 Washington Street, Suite 205 Oakland, California 94607 Main: 510-550-8200 • Fax: 510-550-8211 Fagen Friedman & Fulfrost, LLP 11 By: /s/ Roy A. Combs Roy A. Combs Attorneys for Plaintiff 12 13 14 15 DATED: March 5, 2012 16 17 /s/ Len Garfinkel Len Garfinkel California Department of Education Attorney for Defendant 18 ORDER 19 20 IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED: 3/6/2012 21 22 /s/ John A. Mendez_______________________ UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO SUBMIT AMENDED RULE 26(f) JOINT STATUS REPORT PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?