Aoki et al v. Gilbert et al
Filing
191
ORDER 190 signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 9/8/2014 granting defendants' 189 Motion for Extension of Time. Their answers and responsive pleadings to plaintiff's 135 First Amended Complaint is NOW due by 9/15/2014. (Marciel, M)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
GREGORY FORD GILBERT (SBN 65920)
ggilbert@gmail.com
5112 Bailey Loop
McClellan, CA 95652
Telephone: (916) 643-2222
Facsimile: (916) 643-2080
Attorneys for Defendants
Gregory Ford Gilbert, Bionica Inc., Bionica
Int’l, LLC, Trina Health, LLC, Trina Health Of
Newport Beach, LLC Kevin J. Buckman, MD,
Marc R. Rose, MD, Michael R. McCarthy,
Melanie J. Kunz, NP, MedEdCo, LLC,
Diabetic Life Pulse of Louisiana, Life Pulse
Health, LLC, John D. Mullen, Glenn A.
Wilson, Richard L. Girard, David S. Bradley,
Limi Management, Inc., Diabetic Life Pulse,
Inc.; Timothy Tight, & Fasing S. Chui.
12
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
13
14
15
16
17
THOMAS T. AOKI, M.D., an individual,
and AOKI DIABETES RESEARCH
INSTITUTE, a California Non-Profit
Corporation,
Plaintiffs,
18
vs.
19
20
GREGORY FORD GILBERT, an
individual; et al.,
21
22
No: 2:11-CV-02797-TLN-CKD
ORDER ON DEFENDANTS’ MOTION
FOR ADDITIONAL TIME TO FILE
RESPONSIVE PLEADINGS
Date: Ex Parte
Courtroom: 7
Before the Hon. Troy L. Nunley
Defendants
23
24
ORDER
25
The motions of all remaining and Moving Defendants for extension of time to file
26
their Answers and Responsive Pleadings having been submitted together with the
27
Declaration of Counsel, G. Ford Gilbert, and good cause appearing therefor, it is hereby;
28
Order on Defendants’ Motion for Extension of Time
1
2
3
ORDERED, that Defendants have to and including September 15, 2014 to file their
Answers and Responsive Pleadings.
Dated: September 8, 2014
4
5
6
7
Troy L. Nunley
United States District Judge
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Order on Defendants’ Motion for Extension of Time
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?