Jones v. Office of Workers' Compensation Programs
Filing
30
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Craig M. Kellison on 6/25/2012 ORDERING 23 that plaintiff's motion for leave to conduct discovery is STRICKEN for violation of Local Rule 230; and this matter is set for a Status Conference set for 7/18/2012 at 10:00 AM in Redding (CMK) before Magistrate Judge Craig M. Kellison. (Reader, L)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
MICHAEL R. JONES,
12
13
14
No. 2:11-CV-2799-MCE-CMK
Plaintiff,
vs.
ORDER
OFFICE OF WORKERS’ COMP.
PROGRAMS,
15
Defendant.
16
17
/
Plaintiff, who is proceeding pro se, brings this civil action under the Privacy Act
18
and Freedom of Information Act. Pending before the court is plaintiff’s motion for leave to
19
conduct discovery (Doc. 23).
20
The motion is procedurally defective and will be stricken. As specified in the
21
court’s March 29, 2012, order, plaintiff’s motion for discovery is governed by Eastern District of
22
California Local Rule 230. Under Local Rule 230(b), motions shall be noticed for hearing before
23
the appropriate judge. Under Local Rule 230(c), defendant’s opposition would be due within 14
24
days preceding the noticed hearing date. Here, plaintiff did not notice his motion for hearing
25
before any judge. This violates Local Rule 230(b) and also makes it impossible to calculate the
26
due date for a response pursuant to Local Rule 230(c).
1
1
2
This matter is set for a status conference on July 18, 2012, at 10:00 a.m. in
Redding, California.
3
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
4
1.
5
violation of Local Rule 230; and
6
2.
7
indicated above.
Plaintiff’s motion for leave to conduct discovery (Doc. 23) is stricken for
This matter is set for a status conference at the date, time, and place
8
9
10
11
DATED: June 25, 2012
______________________________________
CRAIG M. KELLISON
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?