Jones v. Office of Workers' Compensation Programs

Filing 30

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Craig M. Kellison on 6/25/2012 ORDERING 23 that plaintiff's motion for leave to conduct discovery is STRICKEN for violation of Local Rule 230; and this matter is set for a Status Conference set for 7/18/2012 at 10:00 AM in Redding (CMK) before Magistrate Judge Craig M. Kellison. (Reader, L)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 MICHAEL R. JONES, 12 13 14 No. 2:11-CV-2799-MCE-CMK Plaintiff, vs. ORDER OFFICE OF WORKERS’ COMP. PROGRAMS, 15 Defendant. 16 17 / Plaintiff, who is proceeding pro se, brings this civil action under the Privacy Act 18 and Freedom of Information Act. Pending before the court is plaintiff’s motion for leave to 19 conduct discovery (Doc. 23). 20 The motion is procedurally defective and will be stricken. As specified in the 21 court’s March 29, 2012, order, plaintiff’s motion for discovery is governed by Eastern District of 22 California Local Rule 230. Under Local Rule 230(b), motions shall be noticed for hearing before 23 the appropriate judge. Under Local Rule 230(c), defendant’s opposition would be due within 14 24 days preceding the noticed hearing date. Here, plaintiff did not notice his motion for hearing 25 before any judge. This violates Local Rule 230(b) and also makes it impossible to calculate the 26 due date for a response pursuant to Local Rule 230(c). 1 1 2 This matter is set for a status conference on July 18, 2012, at 10:00 a.m. in Redding, California. 3 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 4 1. 5 violation of Local Rule 230; and 6 2. 7 indicated above. Plaintiff’s motion for leave to conduct discovery (Doc. 23) is stricken for This matter is set for a status conference at the date, time, and place 8 9 10 11 DATED: June 25, 2012 ______________________________________ CRAIG M. KELLISON UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?