Jones v. Office of Workers' Compensation Programs
Filing
48
ORDER granting 45 Motion for an extension of time signed by Magistrate Judge Craig M. Kellison on 12/5/12: Defendant may file a response to plaintiff's objections to the court's October 22, 2012, findings and recommendations by December 12, 2012. (Kaminski, H)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
MICHAEL R. JONES,
12
Plaintiff,
13
14
No. CIV S-11-2799-MCE-CMK
vs.
ORDER
OFFICE OF WORKERS’ COMP.
PROGRAMS,
15
Defendant.
16
/
17
Plaintiff, who is proceeding pro se, brings this civil action pursuant to 5 U.S.C.
18
§ 522a(g)(1) to remedy alleged violations of the Privacy Act of 1974. Pending before the court
19
is defendant’s motion for an extension of time (Doc. 45) to file responses to plaintiff’s objections
20
to the court’s October 22, 2012, findings and recommendations.1 Good cause appearing therefor,
21
the request is granted. Defendant may file a response to plaintiff’s objections by December 12,
22
2012.
23
///
24
1
25
26
The docket does not reflect that plaintiff’s objections were filed with the court.
According to defendant’s counsel, objections were personally delivered to counsel’s office on
November 7, 2012. Plaintiff is advised that, to be considered by the court, objections to findings
and recommendations must be filed with the Clerk of the Court in Sacramento, California.
1
1
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
2
1.
Defendant’s motion for an extension of time (Doc. 45) is granted; and
3
2.
Defendant may file a response to plaintiff’s objections to the court’s
4
October 22, 2012, findings and recommendations by December 12, 2012.
5
6
7
8
DATED: December 5, 2012
______________________________________
CRAIG M. KELLISON
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?